feat: add sugar method for PropertyLValue (#1651)

[neko-para]

No description provided.

[mhdawson]

@neko-para thanks for the PR, could you add a test as well?

[neko-para]

Actually i'm not sure where should i add the tests. Maybe i shall add an extra entry?

[neko-para]

@neko-para thanks for the PR, could you add a test as well?

Tests added.

[mhdawson]

@neko-para just to confirm its not possible to use the existing operator:

 /// Converts an L-value to a value. operator Value() const; 

instead of adding the AsValue method ?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.79%. Comparing base (b347dbe) to head (740d16c).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1655 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 65.76% 65.79% +0.03%  ========================================== Files 3 3 Lines 2144 2146 +2 Branches 715 715 ========================================== + Hits 1410 1412 +2  Misses 162 162 Partials 572 572 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[neko-para]

@neko-para just to confirm its not possible to use the existing operator:

 /// Converts an L-value to a value. operator Value() const; 

instead of adding the AsValue method ?

The cast operator should always work. Adding the method is generally only for convenience, as explicit calling cast operator is not as intuitive as calling method.

[mhdawson]

LGTM