test: crypto-rsa-dsa testing for dynamic openssl

Fixes: #52537 Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #52781 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

Author: mhdawson

test/parallel/test-crypto-rsa-dsa.js

@@ -223,8 +223,6 @@ function test_rsa(padding, encryptOaepHash, decryptOaepHash){
 
 
 if(padding===constants.RSA_PKCS1_PADDING){
-// TODO(richardlau): see if it's possible to determine implicit rejection
-// support when dynamically linked against OpenSSL.
 if(!process.config.variables.node_shared_openssl){
 assert.throws(()=>{
 crypto.privateDecrypt({
@@ -240,6 +238,55 @@ function test_rsa(padding, encryptOaepHash, decryptOaepHash){
 oaepHash: decryptOaepHash
 },encryptedBuffer);
 },{code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_VALUE'});
+}else{
+// The version of a linked against OpenSSL. May
+// or may not support implicit rejection. Figuring
+// this out in the test is not feasible but we
+// require that it pass based on one of the two
+// cases of supporting it or not.
+try{
+// The expected exceptions should be thrown if implicit rejection
+// is not supported
+assert.throws(()=>{
+crypto.privateDecrypt({
+key: rsaKeyPem,
+padding: padding,
+oaepHash: decryptOaepHash
+},encryptedBuffer);
+},{code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_VALUE'});
+assert.throws(()=>{
+crypto.privateDecrypt({
+key: rsaPkcs8KeyPem,
+padding: padding,
+oaepHash: decryptOaepHash
+},encryptedBuffer);
+},{code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_VALUE'});
+}catch(e){
+if(e.toString()===
+'AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception.'){
+// Implicit rejection must be supported since
+// we did not get the exceptions that are thrown
+// when it is not, we should be able to decrypt
+letdecryptedBuffer=crypto.privateDecrypt({
+key: rsaKeyPem,
+padding: padding,
+oaepHash: decryptOaepHash
+},encryptedBuffer);
+assert.deepStrictEqual(decryptedBuffer,input);
+
+decryptedBuffer=crypto.privateDecrypt({
+key: rsaPkcs8KeyPem,
+padding: padding,
+oaepHash: decryptOaepHash
+},encryptedBuffer);
+assert.deepStrictEqual(decryptedBuffer,input);
+}else{
+// There was an exception but it is not the one we expect if implicit
+// rejection is not supported so there was some other failure,
+// re-throw it so the test fails
+throwe;
+}
+}
 }
 }else{
 letdecryptedBuffer=crypto.privateDecrypt({