Best practices for managing answered questions in GitHub Discussions? #160967
Replies: 11 comments 2 replies
-
The most direct way would be to use GitHub's Mark as answer feature |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
One neat trick I’ve found is to lean on GitHub’s built-in “Answer” feature—once a question’s solved, mark the right reply as the official answer so it pins to the top and anyone glancing in knows it’s done. Beyond that, set up discussion categories or labels (like “bug,” “faq,” “docs-needed”) via templates so every new thread is automatically tagged, and encourage people to drop a quick “TL;DR” summary when a long back-and-forth wraps up. If you’re running a project with a separate knowledge base, you can automate harvesting those golden answers into an FAQ.md or wiki page and link back in the discussion, then lock or close resolved threads to prevent noise. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
🟢 Highlighting Helpful Answers Marking answers (when Q&A format is enabled) is a quick win — it surfaces the best replies. Pinning a key comment with a summary or update is useful, especially in longer or more open-ended threads. Sometimes we (or others in the community) drop a quick recap at the end of the thread so newcomers can catch up fast. 🏷 Organizing Threads It also helps to encourage folks to edit the original post with updates or final answers, especially in support-style threads. That way, the solution’s right at the top. 🔁 Connecting to Docs & FAQs They use Discussions as a first stop for community feedback, and then pull the most common or helpful stuff into FAQs or documentation. Some even use lightweight bots to suggest docs when certain questions pop up. It keeps the info fresh and relevant, and it means you're not constantly rewriting docs from scratch. 🚀 As Things Scale... Also, having a few people take turns doing light moderation or writing weekly wrap-ups of popular questions or updates can be super helpful for the community. Hope it helps :) |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
I’ve run into the same challenge, and a few practices have worked well for us:
On your point about combining with other tools: yes, we’ve done something similar by turning common discussion answers into entries in our FAQ/docs. We usually include the original discussion link so readers can dig into the full context if they want. From experience, keeping things productive comes down to setting community norms: encouraging people to update their thread once they’ve solved it, and having maintainers highlight key answers. I’d also be interested to hear if anyone has automated this — like bots that remind the original poster to mark a solution or that auto-label stale discussions. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Great points! Managing long discussion threads can definitely be challenging, especially in active repositories. Here are some strategies that have worked well in community-driven projects:
Mark as Answered: If the repository enables the “Answer” feature in Discussions, make sure to mark the most helpful reply. This ensures it stands out at the top. Pinned Comments: Use pinned comments to summarize key points, particularly for threads with multiple contributors.
At the end of a discussion, a moderator or active contributor can post a summary comment that consolidates solutions and key insights. Use bullet points or numbered steps to make the summary scannable.
Apply discussion categories and labels (e.g., question, feature-request, faq) so users can filter threads easily. Consider adding tags in the body of the post or summary comment to highlight topics covered.
Some teams maintain a Knowledge Base or FAQ that is regularly updated based on resolved Discussions. Example: The Pearl Lemon Cafe team collects feedback via Discussions, then updates their docs so community members can find answers without searching through threads. Using automation or bots to cross-link resolved discussions to documentation or wiki pages can reduce repetition and keep knowledge centralized.
Encourage community moderation: allow trusted contributors to mark answers or summarize threads. Regularly archive or close old discussions once resolved to reduce clutter. Promote a consistent format for posts and answers—like including the problem, attempted solutions, and the outcome—to make threads easier to follow. ✅ In short: mark answers, summarize threads, tag effectively, and link resolved content to your knowledge base. Combining these approaches helps Discussions remain productive, even as the community grows. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
A few best practices that work well for keeping GitHub Discussions tidy and making sure answered questions stand out: 1.Mark Accepted Answers
2.Use Labels for Organization
3.Summarize Long Threads
4.Link to Documentation/FAQs
5.Moderation Workflow
This way:
|
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Tips for organizing discussions, marking answers, integrating with documentation |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
To keep discussions organized and productive, it helps to: In short, clarity, tagging, and regular summarizing keep large discussion spaces clean and valuable for everyone. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Here’s what works well for us: Also, syncing key insights to FAQs or docs (even using a bot or workflow) keeps the knowledge alive beyond the thread. Discussions fade; documentation remembers. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Discussion Type
Product Feedback
Discussion Content
In active repositories, especially those involving community projects or product support, it's easy for helpful answers to get lost in long threads. I'm looking for tips on how to keep discussions tidy and ensure that resolved questions are clearly marked for others to find.
How do you make sure answers stand out? Do you rely on marking them as answered, summarizing threads, or using some kind of tagging system?
Also, has anyone here implemented a workflow that combines Discussions with other community tools like FAQs or docs? For example, a team I follow who run a side project called Pearl Lemon Cafe uses Discussions to gather customer feedback before updating their knowledge base. It seems to help their community stay more informed.
Curious how others keep discussions productive and organized, especially when scaling up.
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions