This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
Expand TypeChecker to raise SDCLimitation('...Unsupported...')#771
Open
densmirn wants to merge 4 commits into IntelPython:masterChoose a base branch from densmirn:feature/ty_checker
base:master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline, and old review comments may become outdated.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
6d25dbd Expand TypeChecker to raise SDCLimitation('...Unsupported...')
densmirn 27eeca0 Add raising SDCLimitation by default in case of unsupported parameter
densmirn aa8b017 Fix private method call issue in TypeChecker
densmirn 79b1746 Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/IntelPython/sdc into feat…
densmirn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking of replacing all raises related to SDC limitations with this, but it seems this only covers case of unsupported parameters, so for instance in series.fillna we have:
Maybe add in raise_exc and internal func additional parameter e.g. msg, which if exists will be used instead of default msg format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean to replace call
with something like this
?
I think
TypeCheckershouldn't be used for such complicated cases,TypeCheckerdoesn't make sense, when it increases the amount of code and makes it harder.Maybe I didn't catch you correctly, please correct me in this case.