Skip to content

Conversation

@jadlr
Copy link
Contributor

@jadlrjadlr commented Mar 1, 2016

this fixes#33

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

👍

byte[] buffer = newbyte[size];
try{
intcount = is.read(buffer);
intcount = this.is.read(buffer);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is correct but I'd prefer to see state used here instead of this.is.

@jadlr
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

jadlr commented Mar 2, 2016

@davidmoten you are right, it's much better to use the state instead of ignoring it. I added the changes.

@davidmoten
Copy link
Contributor

👍 , thanks

@notflorian
Copy link

Thanks a lot for your PR!

I have several applications which will use RxJava and RxJavaString to process HTTP streams on the fly, and I'd really like to be able to use the latest version of RxJava in the next release I have to do in a very near future. I've tested your PR with my applications, and everything works fine. :)

@abersnaze@akarnokd : Please can you merge this PR soon and make a new release of RXJavaString? That would be very helpfull. Thanks by advance. 👍

@zsxwing
Copy link
Member

👍

zsxwing added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2016
update rx dependency to 1.1.1
@zsxwingzsxwing merged commit f49c858 into ReactiveX:1.xMar 16, 2016
@zsxwing
Copy link
Member

@notflorian thanks!

@abersnazeabersnaze mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2016
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incompatibility with rxjava 1.1.0

5 participants

@jadlr@akarnokd@davidmoten@notflorian@zsxwing