Skip to content

fix: Rate limit protection against rapid resets#4324

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
johanandren merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

fix: Rate limit protection against rapid resets #4324

johanandren merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

@johanandren
Copy link
Contributor

@johanandrenjohanandren commented Oct 13, 2023

References #4323

patriknw
patriknw reviewed Oct 13, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@patriknwpatriknw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking good

patriknw
patriknw approved these changes Oct 16, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@patriknwpatriknw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@johanandrenjohanandren merged commit 1f29fe6 into mainOct 16, 2023
@johanandrenjohanandren deleted the wip-rapid-reset-protection branch October 16, 2023 07:58
johanandren added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
@johanandren
fix: Rate limit protection against rapid resets (#4324)
ebd0599
@johanandrenjohanandren mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2023
Merged
johanandren added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
@johanandren
fix: Rate limit protection against rapid resets (#4324) (#4325)
905559f
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@patriknwpatriknwpatriknw approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@johanandren@patriknw