Skip to content

Conversation

@sbillinge
Copy link
Contributor

  • feat: docstring generator function
  • news

@github-actions
Copy link

Warning! No news item is found for this PR. If this is a user-facing
change/feature/fix,
please add a news item by copying the format from news/TEMPLATE.rst.
For best practices, please visit
https://scikit-package.github.io/scikit-package/snippets/news-file-format.html#how-do-i-create-a-news-file.

@codecov
Copy link

codecovbot commented Jan 18, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (aab1765) to head (a3ca6c3).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #373 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 9 9 Lines 516 516 ========================================= Hits 516 516 
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sbillinge
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@cadenmyers13 I think this might be ready for testing. If it is easier I can merge it and we can test it. I intend to merge this into main and we can push out a release with a patch bump so that the deprecator is available to everyone. Then we can work on the actual deprecations on the v3.7.0 branch and push out a minor bump with those.

@cadenmyers13
Copy link
Contributor

@sbillinge This one would be easy for you to test locally before merging if you want. If you install your branch locally with pip install . then create a new python file and try to load in a random .gr file somewhere on your computer the dep warning should show. Im also okay with you merging and I can test it, its up to you.

I intend to merge this into main and we can push out a release with a patch bump so that the deprecator is available to everyone.

Yes, this sounds perfect. Lets get this rolling!

@sbillingesbillinge merged commit 9c04eb9 into diffpy:mainJan 24, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@sbillingesbillinge deleted the deprecator branch January 24, 2026 00:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sbillinge@cadenmyers13