Move signal import to django.core

[AlanCoding]

Description of the Change

Hi 👋 , I believe this is causing us a problem, but I lack technical rigor to be able to explain it fully. By applying this change under certain circumstances, I seem to avoid a core dump that happens as uWSGI recycles workers when it is running in the default prefork mode. The most relevant description of the series of events is this comment: unbit/uwsgi#1969 (comment)

Here, I just wish to present this as an improvement to follow best practice. In the django.test.signals module, you can see it imports from this modification with no modifications.

https://github.com/django/django/blob/main/django/test/signals.py

However, somewhat obviously... if you import this test module, you will also register all the test signal connections. Now, that shouldn't do anything because the setting_changed signal is documented to only fire when running tests. However, it also pulls in a lot of other imports which just aren't needed, and as this happens in settings, it triggers fairly early in app load order.

This argument also applies to 1 import in DRF, which I also hope to submit a patch for. I'm still working out final testing on my side, so consider this a draft as of opening.

Checklist

• PR only contains one change (considered splitting up PR)
• unit-test added
• documentation updated
• CHANGELOG.md updated (only for user relevant changes)
• author name in AUTHORS

[AlanCoding]

For some more background - here is an issue where they requested to move this signal out of tests https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20349

And in 2014 it was implemented in django/django@5dddd79

Nonetheless it seems plausible that libraries still have the old import, and that it has even proliferated.

[AlanCoding]

It turns out that the change was already adopted into Django Rest Framework here encode/django-rest-framework#8699

[dopry]

@AlanCoding this looks like a reasonable change. I don't think additional unit tests are needed here as long as tests continue passing. Can you update your branch to add a note to the CHANGELOG.md and add yourself to AUTHORS?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1357 (aa37593) into master (a30001f) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1357 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.54% 97.54% ======================================= Files 32 32 Lines 2120 2120 ======================================= Hits 2068 2068 Misses 52 52 

Files	Coverage Δ
oauth2_provider/settings.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today!

[dopry]

Thanks! Your contributIon is appreciated!