Multiple generators in comprehension#594
Merged
+57 −0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
josevalim commented Sep 8, 2015
The traversal case is already shown with the files example. This is great, thank you! |
josevalim added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2015
Multiple generators in comprehension
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@josevalim : I tried my best to give a representation of multiple generators but I am not sure whether its up to the mark you expected. Please do a review and let me know if something else has to be changed/added/removed.
I can see you are not available on IRC but there was one more point where I am not clear which way to represent i.e. traversing. A classical example of that could be
or the same code can be written as (without nested output)