feat(ci): add a backlog clean up bot

[dmitriyastapov]

---

Description of Change

This PR introduces a GitHub Action workflow that helps manage stale issues in the repository.
The bot runs daily and performs the following tasks:

• Skips pull requests and issues labeled as to-be-discussed
• Automatically closes issues labeled awaiting-response or those without assignees after 90+ days of inactivity
• Sends a reminder comment on assigned issues that have been inactive for over 90 days (without re-sending it more than once a week)
• Avoids duplicate comments and respects special labels
• Marks type 'question' issues as 'Move to Discussion'

Added a dry-run mode that lets you preview all actions without making any changes, to run it write "1" in the "Run workflow" input filed

Test Scenarios

The script and workflow were tested on GitHub Issues in my own fork.

Related links

Testing forked repo

(eg. Closes #number of issue)

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[github-actions]

	Messages
📖	🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello dmitriyastapov, we appreciate your contribution to this project!

---

📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

---

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

---

Click to see more instructions ...

This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...

We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against bc77c00

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR introduces an automated GitHub Actions workflow to manage stale issues in the repository. The bot runs daily at 4 AM UTC and can also be triggered manually with an optional dry-run mode for testing. It processes open issues based on inactivity (90+ days) and applies different actions depending on issue status, labels, and assignment.

Key changes:

• Automated closure of unassigned or "awaiting-response" issues after 90+ days of inactivity
• Friendly reminder comments to assignees on inactive but assigned issues
• Automatic labeling of question-type issues for migration to GitHub Discussions

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 8 comments.

File	Description
.github/workflows/backlog-bot.yml	GitHub Actions workflow that schedules daily runs at 4 AM UTC with manual trigger support and dry-run capability
.github/scripts/backlog-cleanup.js	Core logic implementing issue triage, closure, reminder, and discussion migration behaviors with pagination support

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[lucasssvaz]

Just some logging improvements and optimizations. Also added missing labels that should be exempt. PTAL if you agree with the changes and double check everything is working as expected. @Parsaabasi If there is anything you would like to change please let me know.