Skip to content

Conversation

@sivaraam
Copy link
Member

@sivaraamsivaraam commented Mar 3, 2024

This file is being collected to gather the information about the participants that have contributed to Git via GSoC, an outreach program conducted by Google each year. This would serve as a helpful reference.

The intention is not to restrict gathering the information only for GSoC. We've started gather this with GSoC. We'll expand to also gather information of participants who've contributed via Outreachy.

Related issue: #671

@sivaraamsivaraam marked this pull request as draft March 3, 2024 13:52
@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

Since 2015, Git Rev News should have information about all the GSoC contributors, but yeah, it can be helpful to get information about all the previous contributors.

An issue with this might be that we might not want to publicize too much information about the contributors who were failed even though this could be useful information.

This file is being collected to gather the information about the participants that have contributed to Git via GSoC, an outreach program conducted by Google each year. This would serve as a helpful reference. The intention is not to restrict gathering the information only for GSoC. We've started gather this with GSoC. We'll expand to also gather information of participants who've contributed via Outreachy.
We have a more complete list of participants now starting from 2007 until 2023. The supplementary links could still be improved but leaving that to be done on a follow-up.
@sivaraam
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Thank you for you inputs, Christian. I have made the list more exhaustive now and included candidate list from 2007. The supplementary links still need improvement which I hope could be done as a follow-up. I'll try to include more references to Git Rev News while at it.

Also, I've avoided mentioning candidates who have failed as you suggest. Kindly check the recent revision and let me know if you have any further thoughts.

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

@sivaraam, this looks great to me. Thanks. I am Ok with merging this, but it looks like it is "still a work in progress". Can you make it "Ready to review" or should I do it?

@sivaraamsivaraam marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2024 13:40
@sivaraam
Copy link
MemberAuthor

I've marked it for review now. 🙂

@chriscoolchriscool merged commit fe094c6 into masterJun 29, 2024
@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, merged.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sivaraam@chriscool