Skip to content

Conversation

@gbbr
Copy link

@gbbrgbbr commented Jul 8, 2015

Not sure if there was any purpose in having your version as it was, but this should simplify it.

Not sure if there was any purpose in having your version as it was, but this should simplify it.
@neelanceneelance closed this Jul 8, 2015
@neelance
Copy link
Member

Your change is valid, it's just that the purpose is to show that one should wrap the blocking code into a go statement. Maybe this would be better:

 go func(){[...] someBlockingFunction() [...] }() 

What do you think?

neelance added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2015
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@gbbr@neelance