Expand ${pkgroot} variable when reading haddock-html field from ghc-pkg

[mpickering]

This fixes#11217

No test, as it is difficult to test since you need to:

1. Ensure there is a package registration with ${pkgroot}
2. Check the existence of a certain link in the generated HTML.

Manual QA: Inspect the output of running cabal haddock on a package and notice the links to base documentation work.

Please read Github PR Conventions and then fill in one of these two templates.

---

Template Α: This PR modifies behaviour or interface

Include the following checklist in your PR:

• Patches conform to the coding conventions.
• Any changes that could be relevant to users have been recorded in the changelog.
  • Is the change significant? If so, remember to add significance: significant in the changelog file.
• The documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Manual QA notes have been included.
• Tests have been added. (Ask for help if you don’t know how to write them! Ask for an exemption if tests are too complex for too little coverage!)

---

Template B: This PR does not modify behaviour or interface

E.g. the PR only touches documentation or tests, does refactorings, etc.

Include the following checklist in your PR:

• Patches conform to the coding conventions.
• Is this a PR that fixes CI? If so, it will need to be backported to older cabal release branches (ask maintainers for directions).

[geekosaur]

I would explain why here (that is, mention ${pkgroot}).

I'm not sure if this might count as significant. Artem/others?

[Mikolaj]

@mpickering: ping!

[Mikolaj]

@mpickering: a humble ping again