Skip to content

Conversation

@mgagliardo
Copy link
Contributor

@mgagliardomgagliardo commented Feb 25, 2021

Thanks to @whummer I found out my fix was mistaken on this comment: #3605 (comment) related to #3588

I have created these tests on the Java utils repo that match these new requirements. Sadly the only way I could find to fix this out is to "hack" the bytes and strip the double quotes and recreate the bytesarray or string (depending on each case).

Comments and requests as usual are welcome.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 25, 2021

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 70.406% when pulling 51ca836 on mgagliardo:fix/issue3588-2 into d71f99a on localstack:master.

Copy link
Member

@whummerwhummer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR @mgagliardo , great to tackle this issue. 👍 Added a few remarks/suggestions below - can you please review? Thanks

@whummerwhummer merged commit 673434d into localstack:masterMar 22, 2021
@mgagliardomgagliardo deleted the fix/issue3588-2 branch March 23, 2021 08:03
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mgagliardo@coveralls@whummer