Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
test: increase test coverage of BufferList#10171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
887e1ea to 4842402Compare
Fishrock123 left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems ok otherwise, CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5293/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mind to use const/let? :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for pointing this out. Addressed.
italoacasasDec 7, 2016 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit const/let
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for pointing this out. Addressed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit const/let
Trott commented Dec 7, 2016
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5296/ EDIT: Whoops, CI was already run. Sorry for the duplicate. It was ✅ green already... |
cjihrig left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM once it's moved to const and let.
Add tests for edges cases of BufferList - test operations when the length is 0 - test operations when the list only has one element
4842402 to a136e2dComparejoyeecheung commented Dec 8, 2016
Thank you for the review, I've updated the |
addaleax commented Dec 8, 2016
italoacasas commented Dec 8, 2016
Landed f0da38a Thanks for the contribution. |
addaleax commented Dec 8, 2016
@italoacasas I don’t think this is a problem in this case but try to keep the 48/72 hour rule for landing PRs in mind :) |
Add tests for edges cases of BufferList: - test operations when the length is 0 - test operations when the list only has one element PR-URL: #10171 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Add tests for edges cases of BufferList: - test operations when the length is 0 - test operations when the list only has one element PR-URL: #10171 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Add tests for edges cases of BufferList: - test operations when the length is 0 - test operations when the list only has one element PR-URL: #10171 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Add tests for edges cases of BufferList: - test operations when the length is 0 - test operations when the list only has one element PR-URL: #10171 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Checklist
make -j8 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change
Add tests for edges cases of BufferList