Skip to content

Conversation

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

@refackrefack commented May 4, 2017

For assert.ifError fails, wrap the original err in a new AssertionError

Inspiration: #12803 (comment)
/cc @nodejs/testing

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, assert

@refackrefack added assert Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels May 4, 2017
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the assert Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem. label May 4, 2017
@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

refack commented May 4, 2017

The message will not change, but the stack trace will 🤔

@refackrefack requested a review from addaleaxMay 4, 2017 03:15
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented May 4, 2017

It might be the smallest semver-major ever, but I would still say semver-major.

Imagine the impact on someone reading the stack traces if they run the same test on different versions of Node.js (which is what someone might do if they suspect they are triggering a bug in Node.js itself). If assert.ifError() returns a different stack trace in the same exact situation between Node.js 7.10.0 and Node.js 8.0.0, well, that's what happens between major versions. But different results between Node.js 7.10.0 and 7.11.0? I'd be less understanding about that...

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Is this a good idea, though? I think I would usually be more interested in the original stack trace (and apart from that, I think that this won’t work if somebody accessed err.stack before ifError() is called) to figure out why there was an error

Copy link
Member

@joyeecheungjoyeecheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should add a test for this..

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure this is a good change to make. The errors are created elsewhere and passed here. Changing the stack trace would definitely be a breaking change (even if a mild one). I don't think this is behavior anyone would expect.

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Is this a good idea, though? I think I would usually be more interested in the original stack trace (and apart from that, I think that this won’t work if somebody accessed err.stack before ifError() is called) to figure out why there was an error

One could argue that if you want the original stack, just throw it. If you use assert, you want to knwo which asset failed...
It came to me after I sew this:

c:\code\node$ node --no-deprecation test/parallel/test-fs-chmod.js 33060 assert.js:378 assert.ifError = function ifError(err){if (err) throw err}; ^ Error: EPERM: operation not permitted, open 'd:\code\node\test\fixtures\a1.js' 

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

I think we should either throw the existing error, as is, or throw a new assertion error. This hybrid seems confusing.

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I think we should either throw the existing error, as is, or throw a new assertion error. This hybrid seems confusing.

Bingo!

@refackrefack added the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label May 4, 2017
@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Changed to wrapping the original err in a new AssertionError (per @cjihrig's comment).
Now It's definitely semver-major

@refackrefack changed the title assert: generate interesting stack traceassert: wrap original err on ifError failMay 4, 2017
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

Wrapping in the AssertionError works. We will definitely want to run some CITGM tests on this tho

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@refackrefack self-assigned this May 26, 2017
lib/assert.js Outdated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

message isn't used.

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack.
Forgot to carry it over into the last commit.

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

refack commented May 27, 2017

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Ping @nodejs/testing

@refack
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I now kinda hate the current ifError. Re:

1307parallel/test-util-callbackifyduration_ms0.89severityfailstack->assert.js:586assert.ifError=functionifError(err){if(err)throwerr;};^function(){context.actual++;returnfn.apply(this,arguments);}


Throws an `AssertionError` if `value` is truthy. This is useful when testing the
`error`argument in callbacks. If the `message` parameter is undefined, a
default error message is assigned, and `value` is be appended to it.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel this is somewhat contradicting each other. If it should be used in callbacks, there should always either be an error or the result but never both at the same time.

common.expectsError({
code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
type: a.AssertionError,
message: /^Error:test_error_slug$/m
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure how this is any different from the test above. I actually would expect this test to fail because I would have expected it to be wrapped in the ifError failed part.

assert.ifError=functionifError(err){if(err)throwerr;};
assert.ifError=functionifError(err,message){
if(!err)return;
message=message||`ifError failed. Original error:\n${err}`;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, is ifError really failing here? Maybe smth. like ifError encountered unexpected error: ... might be more intuitive?

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Ping @refack

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

I am closing this due to the long inactivity. @refack please reopen if you would like to pursue this further.

@BridgeARBridgeAR closed this Oct 2, 2017
@refackrefack removed their assignment Oct 12, 2018
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

assertIssues and PRs related to the assert subsystem.semver-majorPRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version.testIssues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants

@refack@Trott@addaleax@jasnell@cjihrig@BridgeAR@joyeecheung@richardlau@nodejs-github-bot