Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
tools: update outdated package.json engine field#14165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
lpinca left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess it is technically true but so outdated that it is no longer relevant.
refack commented Jul 11, 2017
Is it worth updating? (I'm deducing latest active version is https://github.com/AlastairTaft/node-doc-generator) |
strugee commented Jul 11, 2017 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Nope, it uses @refack it looks to me like that's an extraction of what's in-tree here right? Not sure what you're thinking should happen here |
refack commented Jul 11, 2017
I assumed the dependency was reversed (that https://github.com/AlastairTaft/node-doc-generator was more updated), so NM. |
gibfahn commented Jul 11, 2017
Then shouldn't it be |
strugee commented Jul 11, 2017
I guess? I mean, I didn't spend a lot of time looking for other ES6 features so I don't actually know. If #14164 lands it will require |
gibfahn commented Jul 12, 2017 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I'd rather keep it if there's a chance that it might save someone some confusion at some point. Maybe set it to EDIT: Or just make it |
strugee commented Jul 12, 2017
@gibfahn I added a new commit changing it to |
gibfahn left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (it can be squashed by you or on landing, either is fine).
engine fieldengine fieldPR-URL: #14165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
jasnell commented Jul 14, 2017
Landed in 49e63ff |
PR-URL: #14165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #14165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #14165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins commented Aug 16, 2017
I've backported this. let me know if it should have been |
PR-URL: #14165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #14165 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
This
enginesfield clearly hasn't been true for a long time and is just useless. So get rid of it.Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
tools