build: suppress lint-md output

[gibfahn]

We don't need to print out the output if we've already installed it, at
the same time we do want to see some output when we haven't installed.

Checklist

• commit message follows commit guidelines

Affected core subsystem(s)

build

[gibfahn]

Previous output after installing remark:

▶ make lint ~/wrk/com/DANGER/node (master) Running JS linter... ./node tools/eslint/bin/eslint.js --cache --rulesdir=tools/eslint-rules --ext=.js,.mjs,.md \ benchmark doc lib test tools Running C++ linter... Total errors found: 0 if [ !-d tools/remark-cli/node_modules ];then \ cd tools/remark-cli && ../.././node ../.././deps/npm/bin/npm-cli.js install;fiif [ !-d tools/remark-preset-lint-node/node_modules ];then \ cd tools/remark-preset-lint-node && ../.././node ../.././deps/npm/bin/npm-cli.js install;fi Running Markdown linter... ./node tools/remark-cli/cli.js -q -f \ ./*.md doc src lib benchmark tools/doc/ tools/icu/

New output after installing remark

▶ make lint ~/wrk/com/node (quiet-lint*) Running JS linter... ./node tools/eslint/bin/eslint.js --cache --rulesdir=tools/eslint-rules --ext=.js,.mjs,.md \ benchmark doc lib test tools Running C++ linter... Total errors found: 0 Running Markdown linter... ./node tools/remark-cli/cli.js -q -f \ ./*.md doc src lib benchmark tools/doc/ tools/icu/

Output when you install remark

Markdown linter: installing remark-cli into tools/ >[email protected] install /Users/gib/wrk/com/node/tools/remark-cli/node_modules/fsevents > node install [... lots of npm output here ...] added 272 packages in 8.462s Markdown linter: installing remark-preset-lint-node into tools/ npm notice created a lockfile as package-lock.json. You should commit this file. npm WARN You are using a pre-release version of node and things may not work as expected added 48 packages in 2.016s Running Markdown linter... ./node tools/remark-cli/cli.js -q -f \ ./*.md doc src lib benchmark tools/doc/ tools/icu/ make: *** [lint] Error 2

I think keeping the npm install output is important.

[Florian-R]

Dupe of #16508 no?

[apapirovski]

I slightly prefer this one, or if @danbev modifies theirs to match. I don't think it should be made completely silent.

[gibfahn]

Dupe of #16508 no?

Damn, I knew I should have gone through open PRs first.

@danbev feel free to steal code, yours already has more reviews!

[gibfahn]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/13595/

[gibfahn]

Better fix at #16635, will close if that lands.