test: remove hidden use of common.PORT in parallel tests#17466
Closed
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().
MemberAuthor
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11882/ (UPDATE: CI is good.) |
lpinca approved these changes Dec 5, 2017
cjihrig approved these changes Dec 5, 2017
jasnell approved these changes Dec 5, 2017
BridgeAR approved these changes Dec 6, 2017
Member
BridgeAR commented Dec 6, 2017
This does not require 48 hours as far as I see it |
MemberAuthor
Trott commented Dec 6, 2017
Landed in abd5d95. |
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: nodejs#17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Member
Should this be backported to |
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: nodejs#17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
2 tasks
MemberAuthor
Trott commented Dec 20, 2017
Closed
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). Backport-PR-URL: #17771 PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.
Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test