Skip to content

Conversation

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Mar 6, 2018
@danbev
Copy link
ContributorAuthor


Environment* env = Environment::GetCurrent(info.GetIsolate());
DestroyParam* p = info.GetParameter();
std::unique_ptr<DestroyParam> p{info.GetParameter()};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Can you add a comment here that says that assigning the pointer will destroy the object at the end of the function?

I like smart pointers, but I think this is one of the cases where the ownership flow becomes a bit less obvious. I find it hard to put a finger on what exactly it is, but I think it’s mostly that we have a new call that creates the object and works with it as a raw pointer on the one end, and use a smart pointer on the other side (i.e. there’s no matching delete call)…

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No problems, I'll add a comment. Thanks

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

@BridgeARBridgeAR added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. labels Mar 6, 2018
@danbev
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

node-test-commit failure looks unrelated

console output:

not ok 1943 addons/stringbytes-external-exceed-max/test-stringbytes-external-exceed-max-by-1-binary --- duration_ms: 26.585 severity: crashed stack: |- oh no! exit code: CRASHED (Signal: 9) ...not ok 1944 addons/stringbytes-external-exceed-max/test-stringbytes-external-exceed-max-by-1-hex --- duration_ms: 29.225 severity: crashed stack: |- oh no! exit code: CRASHED (Signal: 9) ...
node-test-commit-aix failure looks unrelated

console output:

not ok 1244 parallel/test-performance --- duration_ms: 2.838 severity: fail stack: |- assert.js:249 throw err; ^ AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The expression evaluated to a falsy value: assert(Math.abs(delta) < 1000) at checkNodeTiming (/home/iojs/build/workspace/node-test-commit-aix/nodes/aix61-ppc64/test/parallel/test-performance.js:118:7) at Object.<anonymous> (/home/iojs/build/workspace/node-test-commit-aix/nodes/aix61-ppc64/test/parallel/test-performance.js:125:1) at Module._compile (module.js:670:30) at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:681:10) at Module.load (module.js:581:32) at tryModuleLoad (module.js:521:12) at Function.Module._load (module.js:513:3) at Function.Module.runMain (module.js:711:10) at startup (bootstrap_node.js:223:16) at bootstrapNodeJSCore (bootstrap_node.js:562:3)

@danbev
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 1e3dd8b.

@danbevdanbev closed this Mar 8, 2018
danbev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
PR-URL: #19168 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
@danbevdanbev deleted the async_wrap_smart_pointer_weakcallback branch March 8, 2018 05:31
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2018
PR-URL: #19168 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2018
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
PR-URL: #19168 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this pull request May 8, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#19168 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

Should this be backported to 8.x? If so, a separate backport PR is needed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.fast-trackPRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@danbev@BridgeAR@jasnell@addaleax@cjihrig@joyeecheung@nodejs-github-bot