n-api,test: add int64 bounds tests#19309
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot added dont-land-on-v4.x node-api ContributorAuthor
kfarnung commented Mar 13, 2018
/cc @boingoing |
digitalinfinity approved these changes Mar 13, 2018
cjihrig approved these changes Mar 13, 2018
boingoing approved these changes Mar 13, 2018
ContributorAuthor
kfarnung commented Mar 14, 2018
ContributorAuthor
kfarnung commented Mar 14, 2018
@nodejs/n-api Any objections to landing this PR? |
gabrielschulhof approved these changes Mar 15, 2018
jasnell approved these changes Mar 15, 2018
ContributorAuthor
kfarnung commented Mar 15, 2018
Landed in 5fb6f7f |
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2018
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits. Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496 PR-URL: #19309 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits. Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496 PR-URL: #19309 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits. Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496 PR-URL: #19309 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
gabrielschulhof pushed a commit to gabrielschulhof/node that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2018
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits. Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496 PR-URL: nodejs#19309 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
gabrielschulhof pushed a commit to gabrielschulhof/node that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2018
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits. Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496 PR-URL: nodejs#19309 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2018
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits. Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496 Backport-PR-URL: #19447 PR-URL: #19309 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2018
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits. Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496 Backport-PR-URL: #19265 PR-URL: #19309 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added some simple tests to verify that the int64 API is correctly
handling numbers greater than 32-bits. This is a basic test, but
verifies that an implementer hasn't truncated back to 32-bits.
Refs: nodejs/node-chakracore#496
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes