Skip to content

Conversation

@Trott
Copy link
Member

@TrottTrott commented Oct 7, 2018

vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct
72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to
reflect current wait-time rules.

👍 here to fast-track.

Checklist

@TrottTrott added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Oct 7, 2018
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Oct 7, 2018
@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor

typo in commit message

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think its not "these periods" anymore, as we have only 48 hours.

vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules.
@Trott
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Trott commented Oct 7, 2018

rebased against master, typo in commit message fixed, the these periods text removed, also removed extraneous (IMO) italics.

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/1157/

@TrottTrott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 7, 2018
@TrottTrott changed the title doc: rmeove 72-hour mentions in pull-requests.mddoc: remove 72-hour mentions in pull-requests.mdOct 7, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Trott commented Oct 7, 2018

Landed in b155358

@TrottTrott closed this Oct 7, 2018
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2018
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules. PR-URL: nodejs#23309 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2018
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules. PR-URL: #23309 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2018
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
vsemozhetbyt noted that there were two mentions of the now-defunct 72-hour-rule in pull-requests.md. This change updates the text to reflect current wait-time rules. PR-URL: #23309 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
@TrottTrott deleted the not-72 branch January 13, 2022 22:50
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.docIssues and PRs related to the documentations.fast-trackPRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@Trott@nodejs-github-bot@mscdex@thefourtheye@lpinca@cjihrig@vsemozhetbyt@trivikr