Skip to content

assert.deepEqual: fix bug with faked boxed primitives#29029

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
ljharb wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

assert.deepEqual: fix bug with faked boxed primitives #29029

ljharb wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

@ljharbljharb commented Aug 7, 2019

I discovered this bug while perusing the code, to try to bring the npm deep-equal package into sync with node's.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
    • note: the related tests have passed; i didn't run the full suite
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added (n/a)
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module. label Aug 7, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 7, 2019

@nodejs/assert

@ljharbljharbforce-pushed the deep_equal_boxed_primitive branch 2 times, most recently from b30d71d to 2737496CompareAugust 7, 2019 03:17
@ljharbljharb mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2019
Merged
@ljharbljharbforce-pushed the deep_equal_boxed_primitive branch from 2737496 to d90707aCompareAugust 7, 2019 05:55
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 7, 2019

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/24886/

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 7, 2019

CITGM master: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/1934/
CITGM this PR: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/1936/ (queued, will 404 until a worker is available)

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 7, 2019

Not semver-major, but since assert.deepEqual() can get weird, running CITGM anyway....

If interested in making deepEqual() less weird, check out #28011.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 8, 2019
@devsnek
Copy link
Member

devsnek commented Aug 9, 2019

Landed in 885c644...8fdd634

@devsnekdevsnek closed this Aug 9, 2019
@devsnekdevsnek removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 9, 2019
devsnek pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2019
@ljharb@devsnek
test: assert: add failing deepEqual test for faked boxed primitives
e079f6c
PR-URL: #29029 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
devsnek pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2019
@ljharb@devsnek
util: assert: fix deepEqual comparing fake-boxed to real boxed primitive
6c3af76
PR-URL: #29029 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
devsnek pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2019
@ljharb@devsnek
util: isEqualBoxedPrimitive: ensure both values are actual boxed Symbols
8fdd634
... before trying to valueOf them PR-URL: #29029 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@ljharbljharb deleted the deep_equal_boxed_primitive branch August 9, 2019 15:36
This was referenced Jan 20, 2021
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
This was referenced Sep 5, 2021
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Closed
@kissofirekissofire mentioned this pull request Jan 1, 2024
Open
@aliceUnhinged613aliceUnhinged613 mentioned this pull request Jan 1, 2024
Open
@137717unity137717unity mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2024
Open
@molllyn1molllyn1 mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2024
Open
@wedataintelligencewedataintelligence mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2024
Open
@ron-a20ron-a20 mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2024
Open
@molllyn1molllyn1 mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2024
Open
@ron-a20ron-a20 mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2024
Open
@kissofirekissofire mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2024
Open
@aliceUnhinged613aliceUnhinged613 mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2024
Open
@137717unity137717unity mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2024
Open
@wedataintelligencewedataintelligence mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2024
Open
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnelljasnelljasnell approved these changes

@TrottTrottTrott approved these changes

@addaleaxaddaleaxaddaleax approved these changes

@targostargostargos approved these changes

@joyeecheungjoyeecheungAwaiting requested review from joyeecheung

@BridgeARBridgeARAwaiting requested review from BridgeAR

+1 more reviewer

@devsnekdevsnekdevsnek approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

utilIssues and PRs related to the built-in util module.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@ljharb@Trott@nodejs-github-bot@devsnek@jasnell@addaleax@targos@trivikr