Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
doc: update REPL documentation to instantiate the REPL#30928
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Trott commented Dec 13, 2019
Bottom reference needs to be corrected but other than that, looks good to me. |
BridgeAR commented Dec 13, 2019
addaleax commented Dec 14, 2019
@BridgeAR Using |
BridgeAR commented Dec 14, 2019
@addaleax I'll add a note about the behavior difference. The behavior of |
addaleax commented Dec 14, 2019
@BridgeAR It adds the repl to
I think both tools would be useless in this case, and I see no reason to deprecate. |
BridgeAR commented Dec 15, 2019
@addaleax I somehow did not really think about accessing the current REPL. That is indeed something we should not remove. I think we should move that into the constructor and either only make this accessible in the standalone repl or each instance instead of exporting the very first repl instance that is created with
I removed |
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances. PR-URL: #30928 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
BridgeAR commented Jan 3, 2020
Landed in 84b15eb 🎉 |
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances. PR-URL: #30928 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances. PR-URL: #30928 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances. PR-URL: #30928 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
The documentation currently states that it's not intended to directly
instantiate REPL instances. It is unknown for what reason that's
recommended as it does seem a proper way to handle new REPL instances.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes