doc: split process.umask() entry into two#32711
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 tasks
addaleax approved these changes Apr 7, 2020
Trott added the author ready 
jasnell approved these changes Apr 10, 2020
Split doc entries for process.umask() into one entry for process.umask() (which is deprecated) and another for `process.umask(mask)` which is not deprecated. PR-URL: nodejs#32711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MemberAuthor
Trott commented Apr 10, 2020
Landed in 1535243 |
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2020
Split doc entries for process.umask() into one entry for process.umask() (which is deprecated) and another for `process.umask(mask)` which is not deprecated. PR-URL: #32711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit to aduh95/node that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2020
Split doc entries for process.umask() into one entry for process.umask() (which is deprecated) and another for `process.umask(mask)` which is not deprecated. PR-URL: nodejs#32711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
3 tasks
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2020
Split doc entries for process.umask() into one entry for process.umask() (which is deprecated) and another for `process.umask(mask)` which is not deprecated. Backport-PR-URL: #34591 PR-URL: #32711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
jimmy54 pushed a commit to jimmy54/nodejs-mobile that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2025
Split doc entries for process.umask() into one entry for process.umask() (which is deprecated) and another for `process.umask(mask)` which is not deprecated. Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#34591 PR-URL: nodejs/node#32711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Split doc entries for process.umask() into one entry for process.umask()
(which is deprecated) and another for
process.umask(mask)which isnot deprecated.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes