Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
crypto: add OP flag constants added in OpenSSL v1.1.1#33929
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
mkrawczuk commented Jun 17, 2020
Full OpenSSL option flag list is available here: Also I have noticed that several OpenSSL constants here are missing description: I think it would be a good idea to add it, or to put a reference to the SSL wiki where the descriptions can be found, or do both. Let me know what you think. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
addaleax commented Jun 19, 2020
@nodejs/crypto |
nodejs-github-bot commented Jun 22, 2020
mildsunrise commented Jun 22, 2020
+1 on doing both |
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to nodejs#33929.
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
mkrawczuk commented Aug 5, 2020
This PR seems to have gotten a little stuck. Is there anything that should be done to move further? |
nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 6, 2020
nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 6, 2020
mildsunrise commented Aug 7, 2020
Landed in 3306070 |
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes