Skip to content

Conversation

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

In the discussion of #35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson [email protected]

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Nov 20, 2020
@mhdawson
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@MylesBorins is this along the lines of what you had in mind?

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Ironically, the commit message has insufficient context. Maybe this?:

doc: add context for technical values 

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either "will change" or "will evolve" is sufficient.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

It would be helpful if the commit log / PR would contain more information about what the additional context is being added to :-)

In the discussion of nodejs#35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@jasnell updated

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@MylesBorins if you can take a look would be good to confirm the concern you had.

Copy link
Contributor

@MylesBorinsMylesBorins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mhdawson
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@mmarchini any chance you can review/approve since you were in the meeting were we discussed as well?

@mhdawson
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Linters have passed, landing

mhdawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2020
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Landed in 6d3775e

@mhdawsonmhdawson closed this Dec 7, 2020
cjihrig pushed a commit to cjihrig/node that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
In the discussion of nodejs#35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Dec 22, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2021
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@danielleadamsdanielleadams mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docIssues and PRs related to the documentations.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@mhdawson@Trott@jasnell@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot