Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
doc: provide additional context#36201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
mhdawson commented Nov 20, 2020
@MylesBorins is this along the lines of what you had in mind? |
Trott commented Nov 22, 2020
Ironically, the commit message has insufficient context. Maybe this?: |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
doc/guides/technical-values.md Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think either "will change" or "will evolve" is sufficient.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
jasnell commented Nov 25, 2020
It would be helpful if the commit log / PR would contain more information about what the additional context is being added to :-) |
In the discussion of nodejs#35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
mhdawson commented Nov 26, 2020
@jasnell updated |
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
mhdawson commented Nov 30, 2020
@MylesBorins if you can take a look would be good to confirm the concern you had. |
MylesBorins left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
mhdawson commented Dec 2, 2020
@mmarchini any chance you can review/approve since you were in the meeting were we discussed as well? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
mhdawson commented Dec 7, 2020
Linters have passed, landing |
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
mhdawson commented Dec 7, 2020
Landed in 6d3775e |
In the discussion of nodejs#35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
In the discussion of #35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification.
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson [email protected]
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes