test: improve coverage of lib/fs.js

[pd4d10]

Refs:
https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-29f1b609ba5d12d3/lib/fs.js.html#L2045
https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-29f1b609ba5d12d3/lib/fs.js.html#L2056

[Trott]

Not a change to make in this PR, but I wonder if that error message could be improved. Unless I'm misunderstanding, the problem from the user perspective is mode/permissions and not that the file descriptor is bad.

[pd4d10]

Agreed. Since writeFile(fd) and writeFile(path) share the same util function writeAll, this change may need a refactor.

I'll open an issue to track it and look into it later.

[pd4d10]

#38607

[RaisinTen]

According to https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/write.2.html:

• EBADF: fd is not a valid file descriptor or is not open for writing.
• EPERM: The operation was prevented by a file seal; see fcntl(2).

Considering that the file has been opened in the read-only mode and the program is attempting to write to it, isn't EBADF more appropriate here?

[pd4d10]

I guess the point is that it's a writeFile operation in the user perspective, but the current error is about file descriptor, which may causes confusing.

[RaisinTen]

This function just reflects the error that is returned from uv_fs_write, which again reflects the error the OS returns. I don't think we replace the error codes for the other functions, so doing it for this particular function feels a little odd, don't you think?

[RaisinTen]

@pd4d10 This test is failing for Windows. Could you please update it to expect an EPERM for Windows?

[RaisinTen]

Removing the author-ready for now as there is a failure on Windows. Will add it back in after it is fixed.

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/38263/ 💚

[jasnell]

Landed in a1f590e

[richardlau]

This lands cleanly on v14.x-staging but the modified test fails

=== release test-fs-writefile-with-fd === Path: parallel/test-fs-writefile-with-fd /home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/parallel/test-fs-writefile-with-fd.js:74 const controller = new AbortController(); ^ ReferenceError: AbortController is not defined at Object.<anonymous> (/home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/parallel/test-fs-writefile-with-fd.js:74:22) at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1085:14) at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1114:10) at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:950:32) at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:790:14) at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:76:12) 

I tried adding

// Flags: --experimental-abortcontroller 

at the beginning of the test file but still get an error:

$ node test/parallel/test-fs-writefile-with-fd.js NOTE: The test started as a child_process using these flags: [ '--experimental-abortcontroller' ] Use NODE_SKIP_FLAG_CHECK to run the test with the original flags. (node:553301) ExperimentalWarning: AbortController is an experimental feature. This feature could change at any time (Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created) /home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/common/index.js:577 assert.strictEqual(descriptor.enumerable, false); ^ TypeError: Cannot read property 'enumerable' of undefined at /home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/common/index.js:577:35 at /home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/common/index.js:376:15 at writeAll (fs.js:1449:7) at Object.writeFile (fs.js:1494:5) at /home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/parallel/test-fs-writefile-with-fd.js:80:8 at /home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/common/index.js:341:17 at /home/rlau/sandbox/github/trees/v14.x-staging/test/common/index.js:376:15 at FSReqCallback.oncomplete (fs.js:180:23)