Skip to content

Conversation

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

Update ESLint to 7.30.0

Update ESLint to 7.30.0
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot added the tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory. label Jul 3, 2021
Copy link
Member

@TrottTrott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rubber stamp LGTM. Wonder if we should move things like this to PRs opened by a bot or GitHub Actions. The current system is working fine, but that's mostly because there's personal trust here.

@cjihrigcjihrig added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jul 5, 2021
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jul 5, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Landed in 70cf0dc...6dfdb0a

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2021
Update ESLint to 7.30.0 PR-URL: #39242 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@cjihrigcjihrig deleted the eslint branch July 5, 2021 20:11
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2021
Update ESLint to 7.30.0 PR-URL: #39242 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2021
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2021
Update ESLint to 7.30.0 PR-URL: #39242 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@cjihrig@Trott@lpinca@Lxxyx