tls: support reading multiple cas from one input#4099

bnoordhuis · 2015-12-01T15:22:18Z

R=@nodejs/crypto

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/891/

indutny · 2015-12-01T18:37:43Z

src/node_crypto.cc

Let's do while (true) here, and break in loop if x509 === nullptr. I don't think that this deserves disabling lint rules.

The NOLINT works around what I suspect is a bug in the lint rule. If you put the while on a single line (and s/nullptr/0/ to keep it < 80 columns) it won't trigger.

idk, it doesn't look like a good code style to me, splitting while's condition between lines. That's just my opinion, though

/cc @trevnorris - you can be the arbitrator.

Is the following not possible?
if (BIO* bio = LoadBIO(env, args[0])){X509* x509; while (x509 = PEM_read_bio_X509(bio, nullptr, CryptoPemCallback, nullptr)){// ...
If not, I'd say how it is now isn't the prettiest but personally find it easier to logically follow. Which wins for me.

indutny · 2015-12-01T18:38:32Z

LGTM with lint comment.

jasnell · 2015-12-03T21:30:52Z

LGTM

bnoordhuis · 2015-12-08T18:11:55Z

One more CI run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/954/

Writing `// NOLINT(whitespace/if-one-line)` was not possible because the directive was not listed in the list of known lint rules. You can now. PR-URL: nodejs#4099 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

Before this commit you had to pass multiple CA certificates as an array of strings. For convenience you can now pass them as a single string. Fixes: nodejs#4096 PR-URL: nodejs#4099 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

bnoordhuis · 2015-12-08T22:59:24Z

Conservatively tagging this semver-minor.

Writing `// NOLINT(whitespace/if-one-line)` was not possible because the directive was not listed in the list of known lint rules. You can now. PR-URL: #4099 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

Before this commit you had to pass multiple CA certificates as an array of strings. For convenience you can now pass them as a single string. Fixes: #4096 PR-URL: #4099 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

rvagg · 2015-12-09T02:48:45Z

@bnoordhuis shouldn't this have a doc change too?

Notable changes: * build: - Add support for Intel's VTune JIT profiling when compiled with --enable-vtune-profiling. For more information about VTune, see https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/544211. (Chunyang Dai) #3785. - Properly enable V8 snapshots by default. Due to a configuration error, snapshots have been kept off by default when the intention is for the feature to be enabled. (Fedor Indutny) #3962. * crypto: - Simplify use of ECDH (Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman) objects (created via crypto.createECDH(curve_name)) with private keys that are not dynamically generated via generateKeys(). The public key is now computed when explicitly setting a private key. Added validity checks to reduce the possibility of computing weak or invalid shared secrets. Also, deprecated the setPublicKey() method for ECDH objects as its usage is unnecessary and can lead to inconsistent state. (Michael Ruddy) #3511. - Update root certificates from the current list stored maintained by Mozilla NSS. (Ben Noordhuis) #3951. - Multiple CA certificates can now be passed with the ca option to TLS methods as an array of strings or in a single new-line separated string. (Ben Noordhuis) #4099 * tools: Include a tick processor in core, exposed via the --prof-process command-line argument which can be used to process V8 profiling output files generated when using the --prof command-line argument. (Matt Loring) #4021. PR-URL: #4181

bnoordhuis · 2015-12-09T10:51:52Z

I don't know. The report was from someone who assumed a PEM with multiple certificates would Just Work(TM) and that's what I assumed as well.

bnoordhuis · 2015-12-09T10:54:05Z

But now that I look at tls.markdown, we say different things in different places.

* `ca` : Either a string or list of strings of PEM encoded CA certificates to trust.

vs.

 - `ca`: An array of strings or `Buffer`s of trusted certificates in PEM format. If this is omitted several well known "root" CAs will be used, like VeriSign. These are used to authorize connections.

I'll try to come up with a PR later today that harmonizes them.

Different sections said different things about what the `ca` argument should look like. This commit harmonizes them. Ref: nodejs#4099 PR-URL: nodejs#4213 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>

MylesBorins · 2015-12-15T01:22:37Z

@bnoordhuis if this is semver-minor should it land in lts?

/cc @rvagg @jasnell

rvagg · 2015-12-15T05:48:29Z

IMO this is not a big enough deal to warrant shipping in v4, it can wait till v6.

Different sections said different things about what the `ca` argument should look like. This commit harmonizes them. Ref: #4099 PR-URL: #4213 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>

MylesBorins · 2015-12-29T23:25:25Z

based on @rvagg's comment I am removing lts-watch.

@jasnell feel free to reverse this

Different sections said different things about what the `ca` argument should look like. This commit harmonizes them. Ref: #4099 PR-URL: #4213 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>

Trott · 2016-02-18T05:04:41Z

Should this be labeled dont-land-on-v4.x?

indutny · 2016-02-18T05:15:11Z

@Trott yep

Trott · 2016-02-18T05:18:16Z

I've taken the liberty/initiative to apply dont-land-on-v4.x. /cc @thealphanerd @jasnell in case that's all wrong...

rvagg · 2016-02-18T05:35:53Z

+1, although semver-minor makes it unlikely that it'll be in scope anyway

Writing `// NOLINT(whitespace/if-one-line)` was not possible because the directive was not listed in the list of known lint rules. You can now. PR-URL: nodejs#4099 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

Before this commit you had to pass multiple CA certificates as an array of strings. For convenience you can now pass them as a single string. Fixes: nodejs#4096 PR-URL: nodejs#4099 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

Notable changes: * build: - Add support for Intel's VTune JIT profiling when compiled with --enable-vtune-profiling. For more information about VTune, see https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/544211. (Chunyang Dai) nodejs#3785. - Properly enable V8 snapshots by default. Due to a configuration error, snapshots have been kept off by default when the intention is for the feature to be enabled. (Fedor Indutny) nodejs#3962. * crypto: - Simplify use of ECDH (Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman) objects (created via crypto.createECDH(curve_name)) with private keys that are not dynamically generated via generateKeys(). The public key is now computed when explicitly setting a private key. Added validity checks to reduce the possibility of computing weak or invalid shared secrets. Also, deprecated the setPublicKey() method for ECDH objects as its usage is unnecessary and can lead to inconsistent state. (Michael Ruddy) nodejs#3511. - Update root certificates from the current list stored maintained by Mozilla NSS. (Ben Noordhuis) nodejs#3951. - Multiple CA certificates can now be passed with the ca option to TLS methods as an array of strings or in a single new-line separated string. (Ben Noordhuis) nodejs#4099 * tools: Include a tick processor in core, exposed via the --prof-process command-line argument which can be used to process V8 profiling output files generated when using the --prof command-line argument. (Matt Loring) nodejs#4021. PR-URL: nodejs#4181

Different sections said different things about what the `ca` argument should look like. This commit harmonizes them. Ref: nodejs#4099 PR-URL: nodejs#4213 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>

if the valid `ca` is the first item within the concatinated string then the bug addressed by nodejs#4099 was not getting exposed. This test makes sure the order of valid `ca` should not effect the expected behavior when multiple `ca` certs are concatinated.

bnoordhuis added the tls Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem. label Dec 1, 2015

bnoordhuis mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2015
TLS Root CA not recognized when the file contains two CAs #4096
Closed

indutny reviewed Dec 1, 2015
View reviewed changes

bnoordhuis force-pushed the fix4096 branch from 2515455 to c354045Compare December 8, 2015 18:11

bnoordhuis added 2 commits December 8, 2015 22:01

bnoordhuis force-pushed the fix4096 branch from c354045 to 82e0974Compare December 8, 2015 21:02

bnoordhuis closed this Dec 8, 2015

bnoordhuis deleted the fix4096 branch December 8, 2015 21:02

bnoordhuis merged commit 82e0974 into nodejs:masterDec 8, 2015

bnoordhuis added semver-minor PRs that contain new features and should be released in the next minor version. lts-watch-v4.x labels Dec 8, 2015

rvagg mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2015
Release proposal: v5.2.0 (Stable) #4181
Merged

bnoordhuis mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2015
doc: harmonize description of ca argument #4213
Merged

MylesBorins removed the lts-watch-v4.x label Dec 29, 2015

Trott added the dont-land-on-v4.x label Feb 18, 2016

suryagh mentioned this pull request May 5, 2016
test: multiple cas works in any order #6606
Closed
3 tasks

Uh oh!

tls: support reading multiple cas from one input#4099

tls: support reading multiple cas from one input #4099

Uh oh!

Conversation

bnoordhuis commented Dec 1, 2015

Uh oh!

indutnyDec 1, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bnoordhuisDec 1, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

indutnyDec 1, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bnoordhuisDec 1, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

trevnorrisDec 8, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

indutny commented Dec 1, 2015

Uh oh!

jasnell commented Dec 3, 2015

Uh oh!

bnoordhuis commented Dec 8, 2015

Uh oh!

bnoordhuis commented Dec 8, 2015

Uh oh!

rvagg commented Dec 9, 2015

Uh oh!

bnoordhuis commented Dec 9, 2015

Uh oh!

bnoordhuis commented Dec 9, 2015

Uh oh!

MylesBorins commented Dec 15, 2015

Uh oh!

rvagg commented Dec 15, 2015

Uh oh!

MylesBorins commented Dec 29, 2015

Uh oh!

Trott commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

indutny commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

Trott commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

rvagg commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants