Skip to content

assert: fix CallTracker calls wraps the function causes the original …#42909

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 5 commits into from
May 6, 2022
Merged

assert: fix CallTracker calls wraps the function causes the original … #42909

nodejs-github-bot merged 5 commits into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

@Y1D7NG
Copy link
Contributor

@Y1D7NGY1D7NG commented Apr 29, 2022•
edited by aduh95
Loading

CallTracker calls wraps the function causes the original length to be lost. But many scenarios depend on the length of the function.

functionfunc(a,b,c=2){}consttracker=newassert.CallTracker();constcallsfunc=tracker.calls(func);

func.length is 2, but callsfunc.length is 0.

Fixes: #40484

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added assert Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Apr 29, 2022
@Y1D7NGY1D7NG mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2022
Closed
aduh95
aduh95 reviewed Apr 29, 2022
View reviewed changes
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Apr 29, 2022

Should we overwrite the name property as well?

@Y1D7NG
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Y1D7NG commented Apr 29, 2022

Should we overwrite the name property as well?

should use the original function name or the decorative name, eg calls xxx, to overwrite.

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Apr 29, 2022

I think using the exact original name makes more sense, but no strong opinion.

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Apr 29, 2022•
edited
Loading

Am I missing something or the implementation would be much simpler (and less prone to errors like this PR fixes) as a Proxy ?

aduh95
aduh95 reviewed Apr 29, 2022
View reviewed changes
aduh95
aduh95 reviewed Apr 29, 2022
View reviewed changes
aduh95
aduh95 reviewed Apr 29, 2022
View reviewed changes
@Y1D7NG
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Y1D7NG commented Apr 29, 2022

@aduh95@targos Thanks very much for review, I chose to use the proxy solution and have pushed new change.

@Y1D7NGY1D7NG requested a review from aduh95April 29, 2022 16:28
aduh95
aduh95 reviewed Apr 29, 2022
View reviewed changes
@Y1D7NGY1D7NG requested a review from aduh95April 29, 2022 17:11
aduh95
aduh95 reviewed Apr 29, 2022
View reviewed changes
@Y1D7NGY1D7NG requested a review from aduh95April 29, 2022 19:02
@aduh95aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Apr 29, 2022
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 29, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 29, 2022

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/43782/

This was referenced Apr 30, 2022
Open
Open
Open
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented May 2, 2022

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/43831/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented May 2, 2022

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/43835/

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot mentioned this pull request May 3, 2022
Open
33 tasks
aduh95
aduh95 reviewed May 3, 2022
View reviewed changes
@aduh95aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 3, 2022
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 3, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented May 3, 2022

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/43862/

This was referenced May 4, 2022
Open
Open
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented May 5, 2022

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/43892/

@Y1D7NG
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Y1D7NG commented May 6, 2022

Hi @aduh95, can this be merged?

@aduh95aduh95 added commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. commit-queue-squash Add this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one. labels May 6, 2022
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 6, 2022
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot merged commit 187b99b into nodejs:masterMay 6, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented May 6, 2022

Landed in 187b99b

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2022
@Y1D7NG@RafaelGSS
assert: fix CallTracker wraps the function causes the length to be lost
7cac7bb
PR-URL: #42909Fixes: #40484 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
@RafaelGSSRafaelGSS mentioned this pull request May 10, 2022
Merged
@Y1D7NGY1D7NG deleted the fix-calltracker branch May 10, 2022 16:50
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
@Y1D7NG@juanarbol
assert: fix CallTracker wraps the function causes the length to be lost
d5f8b9e
PR-URL: #42909Fixes: #40484 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
@juanarboljuanarbol mentioned this pull request May 31, 2022
Closed
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
@Y1D7NG@danielleadams
assert: fix CallTracker wraps the function causes the length to be lost
9ad0ca7
PR-URL: #42909Fixes: #40484 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2022
@Y1D7NG@targos
assert: fix CallTracker wraps the function causes the length to be lost
5bcf1ac
PR-URL: #42909Fixes: #40484 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2022
@Y1D7NG@targos
assert: fix CallTracker wraps the function causes the length to be lost
ebb334b
PR-URL: #42909Fixes: #40484 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Aug 3, 2022
Merged
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
@Y1D7NG@guangwong
assert: fix CallTracker wraps the function causes the length to be lost
39ea78a
PR-URL: nodejs/node#42909Fixes: nodejs/node#40484 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@aduh95aduh95aduh95 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

assertIssues and PRs related to the assert subsystem.author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.commit-queue-squashAdd this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CallTracker wrapper function to have original function length

4 participants

@Y1D7NG@aduh95@targos@nodejs-github-bot