test: fix tap parser fails if a test logs a number

[pulkit-30]

fixes: #46048

code: test.mjs

importtestfrom'node:test';test('test 1');test('testing',()=>{console.log(-123);console.log(123);console.log('-123');console.log('123');console.log('a 123');console.log(123,'123');console.log('123',123);console.log('123','a');console.log('123 abc');console.log('abc 123');});test('test 3');

Before changes:

TAP version 13 # Subtest: /Users/pulkitgupta/Desktop/node/test.mjs not ok 1 - /Users/pulkitgupta/Desktop/node/test.mjs --- duration_ms: 40.977208 failureType: 'uncaughtException' error: "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'value')" code: 'ERR_TEST_FAILURE' stack: |- #Plan (node:internal/test_runner/tap_parser:653:20)#TAPDocument (node:internal/test_runner/tap_parser:552:28)#parseChunk (node:internal/test_runner/tap_parser:274:35)#parseTokens (node:internal/test_runner/tap_parser:249:23) TapParser.parse (node:internal/test_runner/tap_parser:105:24) TapParser._transform (node:internal/test_runner/tap_parser:187:10) Transform._write (node:internal/streams/transform:175:8) writeOrBuffer (node:internal/streams/writable:392:12) _write (node:internal/streams/writable:333:10) Writable.write (node:internal/streams/writable:337:10) ... 1..1 # tests 1# pass 0# fail 1# cancelled 0# skipped 0# todo 0# duration_ms 52.074334

After changes:

TAP version 13 # Subtest: /Users/pulkitgupta/Desktop/node/test.mjs# -123# 123# -123# 123# a 123# 123 123# 123 123# 123 a# 123 abc# abc 123# Subtest: test 1 ok 1 - test 1 --- duration_ms: 0.677875 ... # Subtest: testing ok 2 - testing --- duration_ms: 0.911917 ... # Subtest: test 3 ok 3 - test 3 --- duration_ms: 0.041959 ... 1..3 ok 1 - /Users/pulkitgupta/Desktop/node/test.mjs --- duration_ms: 52.6225 ... 1..1 # tests 1# pass 1# fail 0# cancelled 0# skipped 0# todo 0# duration_ms 54.201375

I tried to fix this bug, let me know if these changes are acceptable or to be done at some other place.

[nodejs-github-bot]

Review requested:

• @nodejs/test_runner

[aduh95]

Can you add a test case?

[pulkit-30]

Can you add a test case?

Sure.
also fixing failed checks. 🚀

[pulkit-30]

Hey @cjihrig@manekinekko,

Have a look at these changes,
By this we are ignoring invalid Tap syntax from parsing & also displaying it as a diagnostic.
Also added test-case for same here.

[manekinekko]

The fix LGTM. However, I'd recommend moving the fix to the upper-level logic of the parser since we need to catch all possible invalid syntax encountered by each nested parsing rule.

The most common top-level parsing rule is TAPDocument().

[pulkit-30]

Thanks @adhu95 for suggestions,
I think we should add planStart, planToken and planEnd as private member of class TapParser.

Then we don't need to pass planStart and planEnd as an argument to #Plan method...? WDYT?

[aduh95]

I think we should add planStart, planToken and planEnd as private member of class TapParser.

Then we don't need to pass planStart and planEnd as an argument to #Plan method...? WDYT?

I don't think it's a good idea, unless I'm missing something it looks like it makes more sense to keep them as arguments.

[pulkit-30]

There are some failing checks, is there anything wrong with this Pull Request?
let me know, I will fix them

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/49438/

[nodejs-github-bot]

Landed in 4c08c20

[manekinekko]

Congratulations @pulkit-30 🎉

[pulkit-30]

Congratulations @pulkit-30 🎉

Thanks a lot @manekinekko for your support and reviews 😇