Skip to content

https: make https.globalAgent overridable also under ECMAScript Modules#48808

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
whut wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

https: make https.globalAgent overridable also under ECMAScript Modules #48808

whut wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@whut
Copy link

@whutwhut commented Jul 17, 2023

Under ECMAScript modules when you do "import * as https from 'https'" you get a new object with properties copied from https module exports. So if this is a regular data property, you will just override a copy, but if this would be a accessor property, we can still access the actual https.globalAgent.

Refs: #25170, #9386

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Jul 17, 2023

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/crypto
  • @nodejs/http
  • @nodejs/net

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added https Issues or PRs related to the https subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Jul 17, 2023
mcollina
mcollina requested changes Jul 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for opening a PR! Can you please add a unit test?

@whutwhutforce-pushed the pr-https-globalAgent branch from 4b4dba5 to 54579fbCompareJuly 17, 2023 08:58
@whut
Copy link
Author

whut commented Jul 17, 2023

@mcollina test added, based on test-https-client-override-global-agent.js

@whutwhut requested a review from mcollinaJuly 17, 2023 09:01
mcollina
mcollina approved these changes Jul 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 17, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 17, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Jul 17, 2023

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52806/

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Jul 17, 2023

Does it already work correctly with http.globalAgent ?

@whutwhutforce-pushed the pr-https-globalAgent branch from 54579fb to a0dfaa5CompareJuly 17, 2023 09:20
@whut
Copy link
Author

whut commented Jul 17, 2023

Does it already work correctly with http.globalAgent ?

Yes, because it already use accessor property

@whutwhutforce-pushed the pr-https-globalAgent branch from a0dfaa5 to 161b003CompareJuly 17, 2023 09:26
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2023
Open
26 tasks
@whut
Copy link
Author

whut commented Jul 18, 2023

@mcollina I fixed the build failure, I sadly missed to add one "import" of primordial

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 18, 2023
@mcollina
Copy link
Member

mcollina commented Jul 18, 2023

The linter is failing.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 18, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Jul 18, 2023

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52829/

ShogunPanda
ShogunPanda approved these changes Jul 18, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ShogunPandaShogunPanda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2023
Open
25 tasks
@whutwhutforce-pushed the pr-https-globalAgent branch from 161b003 to c8c19cdCompareJuly 19, 2023 08:07
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot mentioned this pull request Jul 20, 2023
Open
22 tasks
@whut
https: make https.globalAgent overridable also under ECMAScript Modules
c1381e0
Under ECMAScript modules when you do "import * as https from 'https'" you get a new object with properties copied from https module exports. So if this is a regular data property, you will just override a copy, but if this would be a accessor property, we can still access the actual https.globalAgent. Refs: nodejs#25170, nodejs#9386
@whutwhutforce-pushed the pr-https-globalAgent branch from c8c19cd to c1381e0CompareJuly 20, 2023 10:13
@whut
Copy link
Author

whut commented Jul 20, 2023

@mcollina I only now run the test locally, and fixed imports in it to work under ECMAScript modules (e.g. ... from '../common/' to ... from '../common/index.mjs'. Test now pass, and linter is also happy:)

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 20, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 20, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Jul 20, 2023

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52868/

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Open
16 tasks
@mcollina
Copy link
Member

mcollina commented Jul 21, 2023

CI failed https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/5609712188/job/15200153620?pr=48808#step:6:5524

This was referenced Jul 22, 2023
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
@aduh95aduh95 added the stalled Issues and PRs that are stalled. label May 11, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actionsbot commented May 11, 2024

This issue/PR was marked as stalled, it will be automatically closed in 30 days. If it should remain open, please leave a comment explaining why it should remain open.

@ShogunPanda
Copy link
Contributor

ShogunPanda commented May 15, 2024

@whut Any interest on delivering this? Can you please rebase this PR after the last main branch so we can run CI again?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mcollinamcollinamcollina approved these changes

@ShogunPandaShogunPandaShogunPanda approved these changes

@marco-ippolitomarco-ippolitomarco-ippolito approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

httpsIssues or PRs related to the https subsystem.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.stalledIssues and PRs that are stalled.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@whut@nodejs-github-bot@targos@mcollina@ShogunPanda@marco-ippolito@aduh95@avivkeller