Skip to content

Conversation

@Trott
Copy link
Member

A few variables in lib/dgram.js are redeclared with var in a scope
where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped
more narrowly with const, so that's what this change does.

@TrottTrott added the dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP. label Jan 29, 2016
@Trott
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

LGTM
lts-watch label applied

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

A few variables in `lib/dgram.js` are redeclared with `var` in a scope where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped more narrowly with `const`, so that's what this change does.
@TrottTrottforce-pushed the dgram-no-redeclare branch from de3c655 to 727d89bCompareJanuary 29, 2016 19:08
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2016
A few variables in `lib/dgram.js` are redeclared with `var` in a scope where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped more narrowly with `const`, so that's what this change does. PR-URL: nodejs#4940 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Landed in 1800bf4

@TrottTrott closed this Jan 31, 2016
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2016
A few variables in `lib/dgram.js` are redeclared with `var` in a scope where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped more narrowly with `const`, so that's what this change does. PR-URL: #4940 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@Trott this commit relies on a semver minor change 137f53c#diff-5c0ca4f44209cc4cc68c4dccadbd4a07

would you be able to manually back port it?

@Trott
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@thealphanerd It applies cleanly for me against de0e293 on the v4.x-staging branch. Or is the problem not that it doesn't apply cleanly but that it breaks once it's applied?

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@Trott have you updated the branch? How are you landing it? git am is blowing up for me

https://gist.github.com/6c9069bd7457291af1cb

@Trott
Copy link
MemberAuthor

It's working for me like this:

$ git fetch upstream && git rebase upstream/v4.x-staging && git checkout -b test-for-myles && curl -L https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/4940.patch | git am remote: Counting objects: 5, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1/1), done. remote: Total 5 (delta 4), reused 5 (delta 4), pack-reused 0 Unpacking objects: 100% (5/5), done. From github.com:nodejs/node a99111a..0242c87 v4.x-staging -> upstream/v4.x-staging First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Fast-forwarded v4.x-staging to upstream/v4.x-staging. Switched to a new branch 'test-for-myles' % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 138 0 138 0 0 269 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 270 0 0 0 1805 0 0 1776 0 --:--:-- 0:00:01 --:--:-- 1762k Applying: dgram: scope redeclared variables $ 

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2016
A few variables in `lib/dgram.js` are redeclared with `var` in a scope where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped more narrowly with `const`, so that's what this change does. PR-URL: nodejs#4940 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2016
A few variables in `lib/dgram.js` are redeclared with `var` in a scope where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped more narrowly with `const`, so that's what this change does. PR-URL: #4940 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2016
A few variables in `lib/dgram.js` are redeclared with `var` in a scope where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped more narrowly with `const`, so that's what this change does. PR-URL: #4940 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
scovetta pushed a commit to scovetta/node that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2016
A few variables in `lib/dgram.js` are redeclared with `var` in a scope where they have already been declared. These instances can be scoped more narrowly with `const`, so that's what this change does. PR-URL: nodejs#4940 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@TrottTrott deleted the dgram-no-redeclare branch January 13, 2022 22:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dgramIssues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@Trott@jasnell@cjihrig@MylesBorins