Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
test: mark SEA tests as flaky on PowerPC#50750
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
joyeecheung commented Nov 15, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
nodejs-github-bot commented Nov 15, 2023
Review requested:
|
richardlau commented Nov 15, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Is this flaking/failing on main as well (I saw the reports of it crashing for the 20.10.0 proposal)? |
joyeecheung commented Nov 15, 2023
nodejs-github-bot commented Nov 15, 2023
richardlau commented Nov 15, 2023
I was curious that the updated doc also says the tests are skipped on s390x but they're not in the Lines 11 to 46 in 59b27d6
|
joyeecheung commented Nov 15, 2023
Oh cool, I forgot about this helper, not sure what we should put in as the skip reasons though, maybe "On PowerPC, loading SEA results in SIGSEGV that's under investigation"? |
richardlau commented Nov 16, 2023
The SEA tests on PPC64 are not consistently crashing -- if they were https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-plinux/nodes=rhel8-ppc64le/buildTimeTrend would be more red. So should these be marked flaky rather than skipped? |
joyeecheung commented Nov 16, 2023
Switched to marking as flaky on PowerPC. |
nodejs-github-bot commented Nov 16, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
nodejs-github-bot commented Nov 16, 2023
nodejs-github-bot commented Nov 16, 2023
nodejs-github-bot commented Nov 17, 2023
mhdawson left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR-URL: #50750 Refs: #50740 Refs: nodejs/reliability#718 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
mhdawson commented Nov 17, 2023
Landed in 136742d |
joyeecheung commented Nov 20, 2023
It looks like we do need ppc64 instead of ppc https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-plinux/50941/ |
PR-URL: #50750 Refs: #50740 Refs: nodejs/reliability#718 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #50750 Refs: #50740 Refs: nodejs/reliability#718 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#50750 Refs: nodejs#50740 Refs: nodejs/reliability#718 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#50750 Refs: nodejs#50740 Refs: nodejs/reliability#718 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #50750 Refs: #50740 Refs: nodejs/reliability#718 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #50750 Refs: #50740 Refs: nodejs/reliability#718 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Refs: #50740
Refs: nodejs/reliability#718