Skip to content

Conversation

@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member

@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowicz commented Jun 11, 2025

some test files manually check for !process.features.inspector to to see if the tests should be skipped, the changes here update those checks to instead use the more appropriate common.skipIfInspectorDisabled()

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Jun 11, 2025
@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowiczforce-pushed the dario/use-skipIfInspectorDisabled-in-tests branch from 71324d3 to da7d9a6CompareJune 11, 2025 12:31
@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowicz added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 11, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 11, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@codecov
Copy link

codecovbot commented Jun 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.15%. Comparing base (e027da9) to head (f6bb399).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #58675 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 90.14% 90.15% +0.01%  ========================================== Files 636 636 Lines 188057 188061 +4 Branches 36897 36903 +6 ========================================== + Hits 169525 169555 +30 + Misses 11277 11244 -33 - Partials 7255 7262 +7 

see 36 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

some test files manually check for `!process.features.inspector` to see if the tests should be skipped, the changes here update those checks to instead use the more appropriate `common.skipIfInspectorDisabled()`
@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowiczforce-pushed the dario/use-skipIfInspectorDisabled-in-tests branch from da7d9a6 to f6bb399CompareJune 11, 2025 13:31
@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowicz changed the title test: use common.skipIfInspectorDisable() to skip teststest: use common.skipIfInspectorDisabled() to skip testsJun 11, 2025
@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowicz added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jun 11, 2025
@richardlaurichardlau added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 11, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 11, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowicz added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 11, 2025
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 13, 2025
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot merged commit 431c04d into nodejs:mainJun 13, 2025
64 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 431c04d

@dario-piotrowiczdario-piotrowicz deleted the dario/use-skipIfInspectorDisabled-in-tests branch June 13, 2025 12:27
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
some test files manually check for `!process.features.inspector` to see if the tests should be skipped, the changes here update those checks to instead use the more appropriate `common.skipIfInspectorDisabled()` PR-URL: #58675 Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2025
some test files manually check for `!process.features.inspector` to see if the tests should be skipped, the changes here update those checks to instead use the more appropriate `common.skipIfInspectorDisabled()` PR-URL: #58675 Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
some test files manually check for `!process.features.inspector` to see if the tests should be skipped, the changes here update those checks to instead use the more appropriate `common.skipIfInspectorDisabled()` PR-URL: #58675 Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@dario-piotrowicz@nodejs-github-bot@lpinca@legendecas@Ethan-Arrowood@RaisinTen@LiviaMedeiros@richardlau