Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
test: move some test from sequential to parallel#6087
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
claudiorodriguez commented Apr 6, 2016
santigimeno commented Apr 6, 2016
/cc @nodejs/testing |
cjihrig commented Apr 7, 2016
LGTM and CI is green. |
jbergstroem commented Apr 7, 2016
@santigimeno: can you run these tests with |
jbergstroem commented Apr 7, 2016
Disregard that. |
jbergstroem commented Apr 7, 2016
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The path has to be updated.
jasnell commented Apr 7, 2016
LGTM with nits addressed |
0d8a8a7 to c085ef1Comparesantigimeno commented Apr 7, 2016
PR updated. Thanks! |
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked.
jasnell commented Apr 8, 2016
New CI after update: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/2221/ |
thefourtheye commented Apr 8, 2016
LGTM if CI is green. |
claudiorodriguez commented Apr 8, 2016
CI green. LGTM |
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked. PR-URL: #6087 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Claudio Rodriguez <[email protected]>
jasnell commented Apr 9, 2016
Landed in eaab17c |
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked. PR-URL: #6087 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Claudio Rodriguez <[email protected]>
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked. PR-URL: #6087 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Claudio Rodriguez <[email protected]>
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked. PR-URL: #6087 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Claudio Rodriguez <[email protected]>
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked. PR-URL: #6087 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Claudio Rodriguez <[email protected]>
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked. PR-URL: #6087 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Claudio Rodriguez <[email protected]>
The only test with modifications is `test-stdin-child-proc` that was passing when it should not because the exit code of the child process was not being checked. PR-URL: #6087 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Claudio Rodriguez <[email protected]>
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change
The only test with modifications is
test-stdin-child-procthat waspassing when it should not because the exit code of the child process
was not being checked.
I have run the tests on
Debian Jessie 64andSmartOSand pass on both.