crypto,tls: perf improvements for crypto and tls getCiphers#7225
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jasnell added tls 
nodejs-github-bot added the util 
MemberAuthor
jasnell commented Jun 8, 2016
Member
bnoordhuis commented Jun 8, 2016
Is this really worth optimizing? |
MemberAuthor
jasnell commented Jun 8, 2016
It's not a high priority by any means but a perf boost is a perf boost ;-) |
lib/tls.js Outdated
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any point in prefixing module-local variable?
MemberAuthor
jasnell commented Jun 8, 2016
@indutny ... updated! |
Member
indutny commented Jun 8, 2016
LGTM, if CI is green. |
Member
indutny commented Jun 8, 2016
Thank you. |
mscdex added the performance 
lib/tls.js Outdated
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
minor nit: true would look better than 1 for a boolean argument
Contributor
LGTM except for one minor nit and if CI is ok with it: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/2986/ |
Improve performance of crypto.getCiphers, getHashes, getCurves and tls.getCiphers by consolidating filterDuplicates logic, adding caching of output, and streamlining filterDuplicates implementation. Benchmarks: crypto.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 2559.3, new = 15890 ...... -83.89% crypto.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 3516.3, new = 24203000 ... -99.99% tls.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 3405.3, new = 14877 ...... -77.11% tls.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 6074.4, new = 24202000 ... -99.97%
MemberAuthor
jasnell commented Jun 21, 2016
Nit addressed, commits squashed, new CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3039/ |
jasnell added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2016
Improve performance of crypto.getCiphers, getHashes, getCurves and tls.getCiphers by consolidating filterDuplicates logic, adding caching of output, and streamlining filterDuplicates implementation. Benchmarks: crypto.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 2559.3, new = 15890 ...... -83.89% crypto.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 3516.3, new = 24203000 ... -99.99% tls.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 3405.3, new = 14877 ...... -77.11% tls.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 6074.4, new = 24202000 ... -99.97% PR-URL: #7225 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]>
MemberAuthor
jasnell commented Jun 21, 2016
Landed in 6be73fe |
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2016
Improve performance of crypto.getCiphers, getHashes, getCurves and tls.getCiphers by consolidating filterDuplicates logic, adding caching of output, and streamlining filterDuplicates implementation. Benchmarks: crypto.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 2559.3, new = 15890 ...... -83.89% crypto.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 3516.3, new = 24203000 ... -99.99% tls.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 3405.3, new = 14877 ...... -77.11% tls.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 6074.4, new = 24202000 ... -99.97% PR-URL: #7225 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]>
Merged
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2016
Improve performance of crypto.getCiphers, getHashes, getCurves and tls.getCiphers by consolidating filterDuplicates logic, adding caching of output, and streamlining filterDuplicates implementation. Benchmarks: crypto.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 2559.3, new = 15890 ...... -83.89% crypto.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 3516.3, new = 24203000 ... -99.99% tls.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 3405.3, new = 14877 ...... -77.11% tls.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 6074.4, new = 24202000 ... -99.97% PR-URL: #7225 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Brian White <[email protected]> Conflicts: lib/internal/util.js
Merged
Contributor
MylesBorins commented Jul 11, 2016
@jasnell lts? |
Contributor
MylesBorins commented Oct 10, 2016
this is not landing cleanly so I am going to mark as don't land. Please feel free to backport |
Contributor
MylesBorins commented Oct 10, 2016
/cc @jasnell |
MemberAuthor
jasnell commented Oct 10, 2016
Not backporting this should be fine. |
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX) orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
crypto, tls
Description of change
Improve performance of crypto.getCiphers, getHashes, getCurves
and tls.getCiphers by consolidating filterDuplicates logic, adding
caching of output, and streamlining filterDuplicates implementation.
Benchmarks:
crypto.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 2559.3, new = 15890 ...... -83.89%
crypto.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 3516.3, new = 24203000 ... -99.99%
tls.getCiphers n=1 v6.2.1 = 3405.3, new = 14877 ...... -77.11%
tls.getCiphers n=5000 v6.2.1 = 6074.4, new = 24202000 ... -99.97%
@nodejs/crypto @mscdex