test: favor strict equality in pummel net tests#8135
Closed
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Favor strict equality checks over loose equality checks in pummel/test-net-* tests.
Trott added net 
Member
targos commented Aug 17, 2016
LGTM |
3 similar comments
Member
fhinkel commented Aug 17, 2016
LGTM |
Contributor
cjihrig commented Aug 17, 2016
LGTM |
Member
jasnell commented Aug 17, 2016
LGTM |
MemberAuthor
Trott commented Aug 18, 2016
Trott added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2016
Favor strict equality checks over loose equality checks in pummel/test-net-* tests. PR-URL: #8135 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MemberAuthor
Trott commented Aug 19, 2016
Landed in 8ff3d61 |
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2016
Favor strict equality checks over loose equality checks in pummel/test-net-* tests. PR-URL: #8135 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2016
Favor strict equality checks over loose equality checks in pummel/test-net-* tests. PR-URL: #8135 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
Favor strict equality checks over loose equality checks in pummel/test-net-* tests. PR-URL: #8135 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Favor strict equality checks over loose equality checks in pummel/test-net-* tests. PR-URL: #8135 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test net
Description of change
Favor strict equality checks over loose equality checks in
pummel/test-net-* tests.