Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overwriting
additionalPropertiesunconditionally means any object schema that intentionally defines a value schema for dynamic keys (e.g. Pydantic fields of typeDict[str, T]) now loses that schema and becomesadditionalProperties: False. These dict fields previously produced{"additionalProperties":{…}}so the model could accept arbitrary keys whose values match the inner schema; after this change the generated schema forbids all keys, so structured outputs containing mappings can never validate even though the underlying model allows them. Consider only forcingFalsewhen the value is a boolean and leaving structuredadditionalPropertiesschemas intact.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.