Support repository categories #4174
Replies: 109 comments 84 replies
-
Perhaps more fitting to the GitHub style of organizing non-hierarchical data: labels? |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Yes, please. What makes the flat list of repositories extra weird is the possibility to create a rich hierarchy of teams, assign complex roles and permissions to these teams in various repositories, and then still have repositories presented as a flat list without any connection to the teams that have ownership over them. If only repositories could be "owned" by different teams and then presented in the same hierarchical order as the teams they are owned by, that would solve this whole debacle for me. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I agree: I'm currently using GitLab and its possibility to organize repositories is one of its best features. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Yes, it would be a great improvement of the repos organization if it would be possible to add purpose dependant repos into ad-hoc folders, like in GitLab. GitLab Subgroups |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
I agree with this idea. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
This would be a nice addition to GitHub. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
It would be a great improvement of the repos organization if it would be possible to add purpose dependant repos into ad-hoc folders, like in GitLab. GitLab Subgroups |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
we're considering moving to github from bitbucket but this is major reason we are getting pushback. gitlab, bitbucket both support this. please consider adding. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
I really need this feature, being able to organize projects by "subgroups" or folders, it's essential. GitLab and Bitbucket have had this functionality for a long time. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
༼ つ ◕__◕ ༽つ Yes please |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
This would be extremely useful, even if it's just 1 level of nesting. I'm surprised this isn't a bigger topic since GitLab has had it for years. READMEs or permission inheritance would be a cherry on top. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is this something that could be done with a 3rd party plugin, or github app, or something similar? Because this issue has been around for a long time, and basically ignored. It seems pretty unlikely it's ever going to be implemented. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
ok, so how do I upvote it? |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
I work at a large company with thousands of repositories and not having a good time here. My group alone has over 450 repos and it's basically becoming unmanageable. We migrated from Bitbucket two years ago and miss this feature every. single. day. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Please! This is sorely needed in our organization. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
Bitbucket and Gitlab does it, why Github not yet? |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
+1 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Maybe another up will help. I am starting to consider to move all company's repos to bitbucket. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
+1 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
+1 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Yes, Repo Groups would be a great addition |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
Jesus, nothing yet? |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
This is a must-have at the moment when organisations move all their codebases to GitHub. Teams are good for managing groups of people but at the same time we need to manage groups of repositories! |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
I don't like spamming but we really need an official update here (please) @tuves@ossanna16@github-staff@jricciardi |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
+1 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
+1 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
At 100+ participants by now can we get at least some official reaction from GitHub, please? |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
+1 This shouldn’t be forgotten it’s unacceptable that this feature still isn’t available at this point. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
-
+1 |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As my number of repositories continues to grow, I'm seeing that it would be great if there was a way to categorize all of them so I could manage them better.
My initial idea includes either doing something where they're just listed under titled headers, or a folder-like system that I could place repositories inside of.
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions