Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
Implement storing runtime state in repo level Git config#295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement storing runtime state in repo level Git config #295
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
webknjaz commented Nov 20, 2018 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
8b05f5b to df45585Comparewebknjaz commented Nov 23, 2018
webknjaz commented Nov 27, 2018 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi @Mariatta, I'm currently waiting for your approval wrt architectural changes. After that I'll proceed with adjusting/adding tests. P.S. @abadger suggested that I could add a CLI command for |
Mariatta commented Nov 30, 2018
Sorry for the delay. Will take a look in the weekend. |
webknjaz commented Nov 30, 2018
Cool, thanks :) |
webknjaz commented Dec 7, 2018
Hey @Mariatta, any 🤔💭 on this so far? |
webknjaz commented Dec 17, 2018
Hi @Mariatta, any comments? |
Mariatta commented Jan 3, 2019
So sorry, I think I'm not able to effectively review this PR. |
webknjaz commented Jan 3, 2019
webknjaz commented Jan 3, 2019
I'll ask @asvetlov to take a look as well, then, to have more eyes on it. |
asvetlov left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea looks interesting.
Would you add tests for it?
At least we have several ones in test.py already.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
webknjaz commented Jan 3, 2019
Thanks for the review, Andrew! I just wanted to wait for architectural approval before investing some time into tests. Now I can proceed :) |
Mariatta commented Jan 3, 2019
webknjaz commented Jan 3, 2019
Great, thanks @Mariatta! |
f4f8d67 to a207fb9Compare4b63d05 to dda278dComparedda278d to 1a5d76fComparewebknjaz commented Feb 10, 2019
Update: with the recent commits I've hit 83% test coverage. |
webknjaz commented Feb 10, 2019
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-Authored-By: webknjaz <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua>
Mariatta commented Feb 13, 2019
webknjaz commented Feb 13, 2019
Thanks. I'll ping them. I think Andrew is away for a couple of days, though... |
asvetlov left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM now
Mariatta commented Feb 21, 2019
webknjaz commented Feb 21, 2019
Sure, on it |
webknjaz commented Feb 21, 2019
done! |
Mariatta commented Feb 21, 2019
Thanks! Will release soon! |
Ref #277