Possible slowdown of regex searching in 3.11

[markshannon]

BPO	47248
Nosy	@markshannon, @serhiy-storchaka, @animalize, @sweeneyde

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2022-04-07.11:30:33.473>
labels = ['3.11', 'performance']
title = 'Possible slowdown of regex searching in 3.11'
updated_at = <Date 2022-04-08.07:22:53.130>
user = 'https://github.com/markshannon'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2022-04-08.07:22:53.130>
actor = 'malin'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = []
creation = <Date 2022-04-07.11:30:33.473>
creator = 'Mark.Shannon'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 47248
keywords = ['3.11regression']
message_count = 4.0
messages = ['416923', '416928', '416959', '416961']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['Mark.Shannon', 'serhiy.storchaka', 'malin', 'Dennis Sweeney']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'performance'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue47248'
versions = ['Python 3.11']

[markshannon]

The 3 regular expression benchmarks in the pyperformance suite, regex_v8, regex_effbot and regex_dna show slowdowns between 3% and 10%.

Looking at the stats, nothing seems wrong with specialization or the memory optimizations.

Which strongly suggests a regression in the sre module itself, but I can't say so for certain.

[animalize]

Could you give the two versions? I will do a git bisect.

I tested 356997c~1 and 356997c [1], msvc2022 non-pgo release build:

# regex_dna ###
an +- std dev: 151 ms +- 1 ms -> 152 ms +- 1 ms: 1.01x slower
t significant

# regex_effbot ###
an +- std dev: 2.47 ms +- 0.01 ms -> 2.46 ms +- 0.02 ms: 1.00x faster
t significant

# regex_v8 ###
an +- std dev: 21.7 ms +- 0.1 ms -> 22.4 ms +- 0.1 ms: 1.03x slower
gnificant (t=-30.82)

356997c

[sweeneyde]

Possibly related to the new atomic grouping support from #76163?

[animalize]

Possibly related to the new atomic grouping support from #76163?

It seems not likely.
I will do some benchmarks for this issue, more information (version/platform) is welcome.

I wrote a script to automatically benchmark some commits about re module in recent months.

Platform: Windows 10, WSL2, Ubuntu 20.04, gcc-9.4.0.
Configure: --with-lto. PGO is not enabled.

The results are in attached file results.txt. There is no 10% performance regression, my_re_benchmark is 1.10x faster.

Compare from 08eb754~1 (2022-03-21) to b09184b (2022-04-07):

 regex_compile: 110 ms +- 1 ms -> 110 ms +- 1 ms
 regex_dna: 149 ms +- 1 ms -> 143 ms +- 1 ms
 regex_effbot: 2.23 ms +- 0.03 ms -> 1.98 ms +- 0.01 ms
 regex_v8: 16.5 ms +- 0.1 ms -> 16.9 ms +- 0.1 ms
 my_re_benchmark: 13.0 sec +- 0.0 sec -> 11.8 sec +- 0.0 sec

my_re_benchmark is a benchmark made by myself, it uses 16 patterns to process 100 MiB real text data.
I used my_re_benchmark to test each commit 30 times, then save/compare with pyperf.

results.txt

[brandtbucher]

Not sure how we're supposed to be linking issues to PRs yet, but check out #91495.

[brandtbucher]

Leaving this open, since it may still be worth exploring where the prior 3.10-to-3.11 slowdown came from.

[Hello71]

Chromium build effectively hangs with Python 3.11 due to re slowdown. generate_about_tracing_contents takes 6 seconds on Python 3.10, and I killed it after 1 hour on Python 3.11.

Reduced example:

re.findall(r'(?:(?:/[^\n]*)?\n)*/', '../utils/common":3}],15:[function(t,e,a){"use strict";e.exports=function(){this.input=null,this.next_in=0,this.avail_in=0,this.total_in=0,this.output=null,this.next_out=0,this.avail_out=0,this.total_out=0,this.msg="",this.state=null,this.data_type=2,this.adler=0}},{}],"/":[function(t,e,a){"use strict";var i={};(0,t("./lib/utils/common").assign)(i,t("./lib/deflate"),t("./lib/inflate"),t("./lib/zlib/constants")),e.exports=i},{"./lib/deflate":1,"./lib/inflate":2,"./lib/utils/common":3,"./lib/zlib/constants":6}]},{},[])("/")});\n')

takes about 0.02 seconds on Python 3.10, and 8.6 seconds on Python 3.11.

Full example: slow.tar.gz