Skip to content

Conversation

@Kentzo
Copy link
Contributor

@KentzoKentzo commented Jan 12, 2023

@slateny
Copy link
Contributor

Per comment I don't believe there should be a backport for this.

@Kentzo
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

#99308 (comment) says otherwise

Copy link
Member

@CAM-GerlachCAM-Gerlach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Kentzo . One set of suggestions, otherwise LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@hauntsaninjahauntsaninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for backporting this!

Looks like it's common enough for past versions of docs to contain "removed" for future versions of Python, so would you mind applying CAM's suggestions?

Edit: Since this has been lying around, I think this is fine to merge as is without the more specific directives; 3.12 isn't finalised and this seems like a short time between deprecation and removal.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docsDocumentation in the Doc dirskip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@Kentzo@slateny@hauntsaninja@CAM-Gerlach@bedevere-bot