Skip to content

Conversation

@markshannon
Copy link
Member

@markshannonmarkshannon commented Jan 25, 2023

This a backport of #101013 in principle, although the mechanism for determining when to skip the call to throw() is different.

@markshannonmarkshannon added the 3.11 only security fixes label Jan 25, 2023
@markshannonmarkshannon changed the title [3.11] Don't call gen.throw() in gen.close(), unless necessary[3.11] GH-100762: Don't call gen.throw() in gen.close(), unless necessaryJan 25, 2023
Copy link
Member

@brandtbucherbrandtbucher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we still want to do this? The code looks fine to me... I'm not sure why the tests are failing, but it definitely seems related.

@markshannon
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Given 3.13 will be released soon and this is working in 3.12, I don't think it is worth investigating further why this doesn't work.

@markshannonmarkshannon deleted the 100762-backport branch August 6, 2024 10:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.11only security fixesawaiting core review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@markshannon@brandtbucher@bedevere-bot