[3.11] Improve assert_type phrasing (GH-104081)#104084
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are unfamiliar with static type checking. I thought of this because of https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384 wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`. (cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
miss-islington requested review from AlexWaygood, Fidget-Spinner, JelleZijlstra and gvanrossum as code owners
hauntsaninja approved these changes May 2, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime
really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are
unfamiliar with static type checking.
I thought of this because of
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384
wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want
assert_type.(cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce)
Co-authored-by: Shantanu 12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--104084.org.readthedocs.build/