Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even with a local file-system this is a substantive chunk of the run time
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bdraco I'm not familiar with the report generated by py-spy. Are you seeing that the os.path.exists() and os.path.isfile() are expensive or the self.format()? The self.format() is probably a different bug that needs fixed since rollover is formatting the message once to get its length and then emit later formats it again.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd expect the format and emit to be expensive here (relatively ... the logger is quite busy). What is unexpected is the cost of
os.path.existsandos.path.isfilewhich is solved by this PR.Sorry for the lack of clarity. This looks like a good fix and I wanted to point out the problem is not limited to NFS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Under normal usage,
self.baseFilenamedoesn't change. Perhaps we just cache the result of the existence/is-file test when we open the file? Wouldn't that be a better approach?