Skip to content

gh-105481: generate op IDs from bytecode.c instead of hard coding them in opcode.py#107971

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
iritkatriel merged 18 commits into from
Aug 16, 2023
Merged

gh-105481: generate op IDs from bytecode.c instead of hard coding them in opcode.py #107971

iritkatriel merged 18 commits into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

@iritkatriel
Copy link
Member

@iritkatrieliritkatriel commented Aug 15, 2023•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

@bedevere-botbedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2023
Closed
@iritkatrieliritkatriel marked this pull request as draft August 15, 2023 12:01
@Eclips4Eclips4 added the interpreter-core (Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs) label Aug 15, 2023
ericsnowcurrently
ericsnowcurrently approved these changes Aug 15, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly LGTM. I've left a couple comments where there might be something further to be done.

(I'm approving under the assumption the comments will be resolved first, one way or another.)

@iritkatriel
Copy link
MemberAuthor

iritkatriel commented Aug 15, 2023

Mostly LGTM. I've left a couple comments where there might be something further to be done.

Thanks. A couple of tests for tracing/instrumentation are failing, I'm still debugging that.

@brettcannonbrettcannon removed their request for review August 15, 2023 21:57
@iritkatrieliritkatriel marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2023 16:17
@iritkatrieliritkatriel requested a review from a team as a code ownerAugust 16, 2023 16:17
gvanrossum
gvanrossum approved these changes Aug 16, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@gvanrossumgvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The revolution! It's almost here!!

A few nits but no need to wait for a re-review.

Lib/test/test_dis.py

Instruction=dis.Instruction

expected_opinfo_outer= [
Copy link
Member

@gvanrossumgvanrossumAug 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test is just preposterous. Let's commit to doing this in a different way in a future PR.

Copy link
MemberAuthor

@iritkatrieliritkatrielAug 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@markshannon loves to hate this test too.

@iritkatrieliritkatriel enabled auto-merge (squash) August 16, 2023 22:13
@iritkatrieliritkatriel merged commit 665a439 into python:mainAug 16, 2023
@markshannonmarkshannon mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2023
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently approved these changes

@gvanrossumgvanrossumgvanrossum approved these changes

@ncoghlanncoghlanAwaiting requested review from ncoghlanncoghlan is a code owner

@warsawwarsawAwaiting requested review from warsawwarsaw is a code owner

@markshannonmarkshannonAwaiting requested review from markshannonmarkshannon is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@iritkatriel@ericsnowcurrently@gvanrossum@bedevere-bot@Eclips4