Skip to content

Conversation

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
Contributor

@ThexXTURBOXxThexXTURBOXx commented Feb 22, 2024

This PR adds an is_none operator and an appropriate test.
I hope I did not forget to update/reference it anywhere else.

Fixes#115808

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 22, 2024

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

@bedevere-app
Copy link

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

@Eclips4
Copy link
Member

Please, update the documentation for this module (Doc/library/operator.rst)

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@Eclips4 Thank you for the suggestion, updated it accordingly.

AlexWaygood
AlexWaygood previously requested changes Feb 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygoodAlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! In order for this to be merged, it would also need:

Here's the most recent PR that added a new function to the operator module, which you could use as a reference:

@bedevere-app
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I have made the requested changes; please review again

Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygoodAlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This looks pretty good to me now. We'll need to wait a while to see if anybody voices any objections on the issue before we can consider merging this, though.

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

No problem, take your time! And thank you very much for your valuable comments. They helped me shape my first PR here such that it fits your needs!

Copy link
Member

@sobolevnsobolevn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! I have several nitpicks :)

@ThexXTURBOXxThexXTURBOXx mentioned this pull request Feb 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Eclips4Eclips4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks very good for me. Good job @ThexXTURBOXx 👍

Copy link

@batellerbateller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

ThexXTURBOXx commented Mar 4, 2024

Rebased on main

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Thanks for the comments - fixed!

@Eclips4
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the comments - fixed!

Looks good, thanks.

However, what is about is_not_none#115808 (comment)?

I think it should be implemented, and I think that it is okay to do so in this PR, since these things are related.

cc @AlexWaygood@rhettinger

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

However, what is about is_not_none #115808 (comment)?
I think it should be implemented, and I think that it is okay to do so in this PR, since these things are related.

You are right. I haven't seen this comment yet. I have also added an appropriate is_not_none function.

@Eclips4Eclips4 changed the title gh-115808: Add is_none operatorgh-115808: Add is_none and is_not_none operatorsAug 6, 2024
@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

If there are no outstanding concerns I'll look to merge this in the next few days (cc @Eclips4 if you have any final comments)

A

Copy link
Member

@Eclips4Eclips4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @ThexXTURBOXx for your efforts!

@ThexXTURBOXx
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

You're more than welcome, thanks for the reviews! :)

@AA-TurnerAA-Turner merged commit 5580f31 into python:mainAug 10, 2024
@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

Thanks all!

A

blhsing pushed a commit to blhsing/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add operator.is_none()

7 participants

@ThexXTURBOXx@Eclips4@AA-Turner@sobolevn@bateller@Fidget-Spinner@AlexWaygood