Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
gh-115942: Add locked to several multiprocessing locks#115944
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
sobolevn commented Feb 26, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
sobolevn commented Jun 3, 2024
@gpshead do you have an opinion about this? :) |
sobolevn commented Jun 21, 2024
friendly ping @gpshead |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: mpage <[email protected]>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gpshead commented Mar 13, 2025
FWIW this PR makes sense to me. |
sobolevn commented Mar 13, 2025
Ok, then I will add all the missing details. Thanks a lot! 👍 |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
vstinner left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add tests on threading.RLock.locked().
picnixz left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just some rewording. Otherwise, once tests requested by Victor are added, LGTM.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
sobolevn commented Apr 1, 2025
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
vstinner left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <[email protected]>
gpshead left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wish I could object to this being a locked() method instead of a .locked property... but this is matching an existing ancient API on purpose so... LGTM.
f7305a0 into python:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
sobolevn commented Apr 8, 2025
Thanks everyone! 🎉 |
TODO:
AcquirerProxyobject has no attributelocked#115942